Basic characteristics of included studies
Author | Evidence | Design | Matching | RA | CA | Follow-up | Quality score | Country | |
No | Robot type | No | |||||||
Lim et al 20158 | 2b | RCT | 12 345 | 24 | ROBDOC | 25 | 24 months | RCT | Korea |
Nakamura et al 20109 | 2b | RCT | 1234 | 75 | ROBDOC | 71 | 5 years | RCT | Japan |
Nishihara et al 200610 | 2b | RCT | 12 | 78 | ROBDOC | 78 | 24 months | RCT | Japan |
Hananouchi et al 200711 | 3b | RP | 13 | 31 | ROBDOC | 27 | 24 months | ★★★★★★★ | Japan |
Siebel et al 200512 | 3b | RP | 12 | 36 | CASPAR | 35 | 17.9 months | ★★★★★★ | Germany |
Domb et al 20146 | 3b | R | 12 345 | 50 | MAKO | 50 | NS | ★★★★★★★ | USA |
Domb et al 201513 | 3b | R | 12 | 228 | MAKO | 708 | NS | ★★★★★★ | USA |
Design: R, retrospective; RP, retrospective design. Matching: (1) age; (2) gender; (3) body mass index; (4) aetiology; (5) single surgeon.
CA, conventional arthroplasty; NS, not specified; RA, robotic-assisted arthroplasty; RCT, randomised clinical trial.