Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Relative Fat Mass Index can be solution for obesity paradox in coronary artery disease severity prediction calculated by SYNTAX Score
  1. Süleyman Çağan Efe1,
  2. Ali Karagoz1,
  3. Cem Dogan1,
  4. Zubeyde Bayram1,
  5. Sedat Kalkan1,
  6. Mehmet Sait Altıntas2,
  7. Yasin Yuksel2,
  8. Turgut Karabag2,
  9. Burak Ayca2,
  10. Nihal Ozdemir1
  1. 1Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  2. 2Cardiology, Istanbul Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  1. Correspondence to Süleyman Çağan Efe, Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34865, Turkey; scaganefe{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background The relation between body mass index (BMI) and coronary artery disease (CAD) extension remains controversial. A new score was developed to estimate body fat percentage (BFP) known as Relative Fat Mass (RFM) Index. This study aimed to evaluate the value of RFM Index in predicting the severity of the CAD, compared with other anthropometric measurements.

Methods A total of 325 patients with chronic CAD were investigated. RFM, BFP, BMI and other anthropometric characteristics of patients were measured before angiography. CAD severity was determined by SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery trial (SYNTAX) Score. The association between SYNTAX Score and variables was evaluated using linear regression models. In order to compare the model performance, R-squared (R2), Akaike’s information criterion, Bayesian information criterion and root mean square error were used.

Results Univariate linear regression outcome variable, SYNTAX was used to determine whether there was any relationship between variables. Independent variables were included in the multivariable linear logistic regression models. The analysis showed that in model 1, RFM (β coefficient: 2.31 (0.90 to 3.71), p=0.001)), diabetes mellitus (β coefficient: 3.72 (1.67 to 3.76), p=0.004)), haemoglobin (β coefficient: −2.12 (−3.70 to −0.53), p=0.03) and age (β coefficient: 1.83 (0.29 to 3.37), p=0.02)) were statistically significant. The adjusted R2 values in model 1 were higher than model 2 (BFP) and model 3 (BMI) (0.155, 0.137 and 0.130, respectively), and χ2 values of RFM were higher than BFP and BMI (10.5, 3.4 and 1.0, respectively).

Conclusion RFM Index is a more reliable and compatible marker of obesity in showing the severity of CAD compared to BMI.

  • adult cardiology
  • coronary heart disease
  • ischaemic heart disease
  • public health
  • diabetes & endocrinology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Concept: SCE, NO and TK. Design: SCE, BA and SK. Data collection or processing: CD, SK, YY, MSA, ZB and SCE. Analysis or interpretation: SCE, AK and NO. Literature search: SCE, SK, AK and NO. Writing: SCE and all authors controls.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The research protocol of this study was approved by the Research Review Committee of the Department of Cardiology and the Ethical Committee prior to starting the research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available upon reasonable request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.