Responses

Download PDFPDF

Denial, distress and hope: why we need to talk about nuclear war
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    ABC risks for public health by introducing foreign military bases
    • Yasuharu Tokuda, Internal Medicine Physician Tsukuba University
    • Other Contributors:
      • Yoshio Kinjo, Physicist

    We agree that a nuclear catastrophe would result if these weapons were used. In this letter, we would like to add public health risks by military membership with other countries. After Russia’s invasion into Ukraine, there is increasing public support in Finland and Sweden for joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) (1, 2). Although we understand an advantage in Finland and Sweden for countering possible invasion by military membership, there is a risk of disadvantages of environmental contamination and epidemic spread caused by introducing foreign military bases. There will be ABC (atomic, biological, and chemical) risks for public health from introducing military bases. In fact, these risks have been observed in Okinawa. The prefecture of Japan has had U.S. military bases over the 77 years.

    Atomic contamination happened in Okinawa because of the historical background of 1,400 nuclear weapons equipped in Okinawa in the 1960s. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, a nuclear missile was misfired from the U.S. military base in Naha, the local capital of Okinawa (3). There was also an accident in which an aircraft carrying a nuclear bomb fell from an aircraft carrier in the waters near Okinawa (4). The lost nuclear missile and bomb have never been removed and are still submerged in the waters near Okinawa. At the period of the Iraq War, the U.S. military conducted training to launch more than 1,000 depleted uranium bombs on an uninhabited island of Okinawa (5)...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.