Statistics from Altmetric.com
Misunderstanding is generally simpler than true understanding, and hence has more potential for popularity. —Raheel Farooq (writer)
In an Australian study, the most common mishap with endotracheal tube (ETT) placement was inadvertent endobronchial intubation (ETT placed too deep), more so than oesophageal intubation, accounting for nearly half of all the ETT-related incident reports.1 In the prehospital setting in a German study, emergency physicians inadvertently intubated the right mainstem bronchus in 6.7% of their intubations.2 In patients intubated by an emergency physician or anaesthesiologist in a German emergency department, the incidence of right mainstem intubation was 7%.3 In that study, the ETT tip was within 2 cm of the carina in another 13% of patients.3 When an ETT tip is that close to the carina, events such as head flexion can move the ETT up to 3.1 cm (mean 1.9 cm) toward the carina from the neutral position.4 Furthermore, rostral displacement of the carina because of Trendelenburg positioning (to treat hypotension, to cannulate a central vein or during surgery) or pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopy can result in right mainstem bronchial intubation. The margin of safety is correspondingly small in small patients. Mainstem intubation could trigger bronchospasm, cause hypoxaemia due to a massive shunt and atelectasis, and the increased inspiratory pressure may result in barotrauma and even haemodynamic disturbances. In complex cases (eg, major trauma), it can complicate diagnosis and management of life-threatening injuries. Endobronchial intubation accounts for 2% of adverse respiratory claims in adults and 4% in children in the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Closed Claims Database.5
Inadvertent mainstem intubation is therefore an important discussion topic with learners rotating through anaesthesia, emergency medicine, critical care and surgery. Spanning over 3 decades of our careers, we must have asked hundreds of residents and students in and from …
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it first published. The provenance and peer review statement has been included.
Contributors AMHH helped prepare the figure, drafted, revised and approved the final manuscript. GK helped prepare the figure, drafted, revised and approved the final manuscript. GM helped prepare the figure, drafted, revised and approved the final manuscript.
Funding Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.