Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Infectious diseases
- Infection control
- Internal medicine
- Thoracic medicine
- Adult dermatology
- Public health
A 39-year-old woman presented with localized urticaria following N95 respirator use in a COVID-19 unit. After approximately 15 minutes of wear, she developed pruritus on her face, without associated angioedema or dyspnea. She had no history of cutaneous reactions to N95 respirators. Physical examination revealed several wheals with surrounding erythema limited to the area occluded by the N95 respirator (figure 1). On evaluation, firm stroking of the volar aspect of her forearm produced linear wheals (figure 2); she was subsequently diagnosed with dermatographism. Symptoms resolved within 1 hour of antihistamine use.
Dermatographism is characterised by the development of a wheal and flare reaction after pressure is applied to the skin by stroking or scratching, typically within minutes and persisting up to an hour.1 Symptoms typically self-resolve within an hour. Antihistamines can be used in symptomatic dermatographism. The pathogenesis is likely related to vasoactive mediators released by mast cells as elevated serum levels of histamine have been associated.2 Differential diagnoses including pressure urticaria and contact dermatitis can be ruled out based on inciting factor, timing of onset and resolution with antihistamines.
N95 respirators are recommended for healthcare workers (HCWs) who provide care for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.3 The recent pandemic has led to increased and extended respirator use. While evidence supports these respirators as offering substantial protection against COVID-19, this case highlights that occupational health departments should be alert for adverse cutaneous reactions that may affect HCWs.4
Contributors KHW contributed to conception, initial drafting of manuscript and final approval of the manuscript. TM, RO and GKS contributed to conception, critical revision of content and final approval of the manuscript. All authors are in agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Consent obtained directly from patient(s).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.