Download PDFPDF

Against diagnosis
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Language Matters
    • Martin Whyte, Consultant Physician & Clinical Senior Lecturer University of Surrey
    • Other Contributors:
      • Debbie Cooke, Psychologist and Reader in Health Psychology

    The article by Launer [1] raises the issue as to whether diagnostic labels are to be avoided as they can be stigmatising and judgemental. Within the article, the term ‘patient’ was used to convey the individual in receipt of the diagnosis. In recent years it has been suggested that ‘patient’ itself be avoided - as it can imply passivity in the face of the medical profession [2]. The word derives from the latin patiens, which means suffering; but also acquiescing, allowing and submitting. This latter connotation implies that a patient ‘receives’ the diagnosis - rather than being empowered to work with the doctor towards a meaningful interpretation of their symptoms and/or resolution of them. Use of the term ‘patient’ by healthcare workers may then lead to the medicalisation of thought towards the individual (semantic determinism). Conversely, surveys have suggested that people prefer to be called a patient [3]. This may reflect the lack of adequate alternative descriptors. To be a ‘patient’ may also be advantageous as it will then clarify to the health care professional and the legal system, the unique obligation they have to that individual. Perhaps, as with ‘diagnosis’, we should seek permission from the individuals themselves whether to refer to them as patients?

    1. Launer J. Postgrad Med J. 2021 Jan;97(1143):67-68. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139298.
    2. Cooper A., Kanumilli N., Hill J., Holt R.I.G et al. Diabetic Medicine. Language matters. Addressin...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.