Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Paediatric Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): behaviours, trends and implications
  1. Jack Barton1,
  2. Jonathan Round2,
  3. Katie Knight3
  1. 1 Student, University of London, St George's, London, UK
  2. 2 Paediatric Intensive Care, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  3. 3 Paediatric Emergency Medicine, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Jack Barton, Student, University of London, St George's, London SW17 0RE, UK; jack.barton1994{at}yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

Introduction Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM) describes online resources assisting learning in medicine. Little is known about users or their behaviours.

Methods Using Google Analytics for a popular FOAM site (www.paedatricfoam.com), we explored user demographics and patterns of behaviour. We analysed these further with descriptive and statistical tests using SPSS (version 26). Data are presented as mean (SD).

Results There were 181.44 (75.16) mean daily users accessing the site throughout a 4-month period during 2018/2019. 68.9% of users were female; 44% were 25–34 years; 57.3% used a mobile device. The mean session duration was 73.55 (9.41) seconds, with more time spent per session and a greater number of pages per session observed in users accessing the site from a desktop or tablet as opposed to a mobile phone. 84.3% of mobile users left the site after viewing a single page. Referral source was also associated with device used (p<0.001). Age was not related to user behaviours (p>0.05).

Discussion FOAM is a rapidly developing form of medical education, with large user numbers seen for a site just 2 years old. The site is being used by many beyond its intended readership. Rather than accessing multiple pages from a desktop, users have varied online behaviours, with the majority viewing a single page on a mobile phone, referred by social media or Google.

Conclusions Google Analytics can powerfully display usage of medical websites but has important limitations if statistical exploration is required. FOAM users are a heterogenous group, and thus content should be designed with this in mind. Further research must be prioritised focussing on the scope, curriculum coverage, accuracy of information and the effectiveness of FOAM as an educational resource.

  • education & training (see medical education & training)
  • medical education & training
  • paediatrics
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Twitter @JackBarton07

  • Contributors All of the stated researchers (JR, KK, JB) were involved in the planning and writing stages of the study. JB was also involved in the data collection and analysis stage. All researchers had oversight and reviewed each stage of the study, via direct communication and progress meetings.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests KK is the lead editor for www.paediatricfoam.com. JR is an editor for www.paediatricfoam.com.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval After discussion with St George’s Research and Ethics Committee, ethical approval was deemed unnecessary for this paper, due to the use of retrospective metadata collected by Google Analytics.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.