Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Osler Centenary Papers: Would Sir William Osler be a role model for medical trainees and physicians today?
  1. Vivek K Murthy, First author,
  2. Scott M Wright
  1. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Scott M Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; swright{at}; Dr Vivek K Murthy; Vivekmurthy{at}


If Sir William Osler were alive and practising as one of our contemporary colleagues, would he be viewed as a role model by medical trainees and other physicians? Recently published literature has sought to define clinical excellence; this characterisation of physician performance establishes a context in which role models in medicine can be appraised. Building on this framework, we present rich anecdotes and quotes from Sir William Osler himself, his colleagues, and his students to consider whether Osler would have been regarded as a role model for clinical excellence today. This paper illustrates convincingly that William Osler indeed personified clinical excellence and would have been appreciated as a consummate role model if he were alive and on a medical school’s faculty today. However, a century has passed since his death, and he is not sufficiently visible today to serve as a role model to modern medical trainees and physicians. Moreover, we speculate that Osler himself would not have wanted to be a role model for today’s trainees, as he emphasised that medicine is best learned from teachers at the bedside—a place where he cannot be. Reanimating Osler through rich stories and inspiring quotes, and translating his example of clinical excellence into modern clinical practice, can remind us all to carry Oslerian virtues with us in our professional work.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Contributors VM and SW planned the outline and structure of the manuscript. They both researched the relevant materials/sources and wrote the manuscript. Both authors were involved in the critical review and final edits to the manuscript.

  • Funding SW receives support as the Anne Gaines and G Thomas Miller Professor of Medicine through the Johns Hopkins Center for Innovative Medicine.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.