Download PDFPDF
Have guidelines lost their way?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Have guidelines lost their way?
    • Peter C Gates, Neurologist Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia

    With all due respect to Dr Philip Welsby 1I think he has misunderstood my paper on the 5*3*5 rule for examining the upper limb. The 5*3*5 rule is not a guideline, it represents a paradigm shift in the way we should examine the upper limbs.

    In my experience guidelines are written by experts using what little evidence we have liberally laced with "expert opinion" to help guide clinicians to manage patients. I would agree with Dr Welsby that guidelines are often complex, impossible to memorise and difficult to use.

    The 5*3*5 rule does not require any knowledge of neuroanatomy nor does it need to be memorised. The idea is that the clinician has the pictures and the tables readily available in their clinic. All they have to do is examine the muscles, establish which muscles are weak and then consult the relevant table(s). A previous rule that I have published, the rule of four of the brainstem2 is used in this way. I have been informed by colleagues that they've seen this rule on computers in Accident and Emergency Departments.

    The 5*3*5 rule is not intended only for neurologists, it empowers non-neurologist's to accurately diagnose the cause of weakness in the upper limb. I have taught the rule to medical students in Australia, Rwanda and Fiji, to postgraduate physician trainees and osteopaths who have all found it useful.

    1. Welsby PD. Have guidelines lost their way? Postgrad Med J 2019; 95(1127): 469.

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.