Download PDFPDF
Head, heart or checklist? How self-reported decision-making strategies change according to speciality and grade: a cross-sectional survey of doctors
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The tension between "gestalt" and the checklist

    The tension between head, heart and checklist is strikingly exemplified by the clinical decision process involved in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism(PE). Currently, this process is characterised by a proliferation of clinical decision rules which involve mind numbingly long lists of items, and their associated calculations, the latter intended to generate numerical scores(1)(2) which confer a semblance of scientific credibility to the process. By contrast, a school of thought has emerged which posits that clinical acumen, defined as unstructured clinical impression or "gestalt" is, at the very least, as reliable a sole reliance on clinical prediction rules for discriminating among patients who have a low, moderate, or high pretest probability of PE(1). Over time, gestalt, itself, appears progressively to confer increasing diagnostic accuracy, judging by the diagnostic performance of senior physicians(postgraduate year 4 plus) vs interns(postgraduate year 1) working in the emergency department of a large teaching hospital(3). Concurrently, we have seen the emergence of gestalt-based clinical decision strategies such as the PERC rule(4) and the YEARS algorithm(5). as an attempt to resolve the tension between underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of PE.
    Clinical acumen, itself, performs best when it is informed, not only by the numerical score of years since obtaining one's medical qualification, but also by interaction(through the medium of case co...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.