Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The choice of medical specialty is a crucial point in medical students’ career. Such a decision affects decisively students’ professional future and defines the layout of the medical personnel that will eventually staff both public and private medical sector.1 Factors affecting the final decision are related with expectations about working environment, popularity of each specialty as well as the work-life balance that each specialty entails.2–5
Meanwhile, as Greece is experiencing (or finalising) the seventh consecutive year of a deep financial crisis, the funding of the National Healthcare System (Greek NHS) and the health sector in general has been radically reduced. Austerity measures resulted in severe cuts in healthcare services provided by Greek NHS including a significant reduction of doctors’ allowances.6 7 The crisis also affected private healthcare, therefore forcing private physicians to reduce the cost of provided medical services in order to remain competitive. Apart from the financial aspect, young graduates of Medicine have to enrol in a waiting list for a training post in the hospital of their choice. There is no process of selection as in most developed countries, either examinations or an interview, rather a simple waiting list. This situation creates long waiting times for certain more popular specialties. As a result, an increasing proportion of medical students sincerely consider the possibility of migration after graduation.
In order to study the impact of the economic crisis on the intentions of medical students regarding the choice of a specialty and professional migration, an observational questionnaire-based survey was conducted at the …
Contributors SP, GK and TD have provided substantial contribution to the conception and design of work. SP, GK, CM-S and PC have contributed significantly in the acquisition of data. AM and AA have contributed significantly in the interpretation of data for the work. SP, GK, CM-S and TD have drafted the work, while all other coauthors have revised it critically for important intellectual content.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.