Objectives To identify how trainee doctors introduce themselves to patients.
Setting Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London.
Participants One hundred trainee doctors, of mixed grades and specialties.
Main outcome measures Introducing oneself by name, using their professional title ‘Dr’, use of the term ‘trainee’.
Results All 100 participants introduced themselves by name to patients, with 63% using only their first name, 18% using only their last name and 18% using a combination of both. 67% mentioned their specialty and 18% mentioned their training grade. 85% identified themselves as a doctor, but only 22% used their professional title (Dr), and only 6% introduced themselves by name, grade, specialty and title. 80% varied the way they introduced themselves to patients, depending on several factors including the clinical situation and patients' characteristics/features. 56% said that they had changed the way they introduced themselves over time, and 42% deliberately avoided the term 'trainee' during introductions. There was no association between trainees’ age, gender or specialty and their comfort in describing themselves as ‘trainees', but the more junior trainees were more comfortable using this term than the senior grades (p<0.0001). Overall, 76% disliked the term ‘trainee’, for various reasons.
Conclusion All doctors in this study introduced themselves by name but the majority did not specify their training grade or trainee status, predominantly because they believed it could trigger anxiety around their competence or undermine confidence in their abilities.
- adult anaesthesia
- anaesthesia in obstetrics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors MS, AT and SMY planned the study. AT conducted the questionnaire survey. MS, AT and SMY wrote the article. AT submitted the study. SMY is the guarantor of the study. All authors take public responsibility for the contents, have contributed substantially to the drafting and have approved the final version.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclaimer The work is registered with the Chelsea and Westminster Trust Clinical Audit Department. The work described has only been published in abstract form, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and does not duplicate or overlap other published work.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.