Download PDFPDF
Secondary syphilis: lest we forget it
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Secondary syphilis in the context of HIV-related immunosuppression

    The secondary syphilis we see today is potentially different from the secondary syphilis which belongs to the era antedating the presently high incidence and prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Sexually active subjects who harbour the coexistence of HIV infection (with attendant immune suppression) and syphilis are also at risk of opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis and cryptococcosis (1)(2)(3). In one HIV-positive patient aged 43, neurosyphilis coexisted with both cryptococcal meningitis and tuberculous meningitis. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was characterised by lymphocyte predominance low glucose and high protein. Furthermore, in the CSF, cryptococcal antigen amounted to 1;640, and the VDRL from the CSF was also reactive. CSF culture grew M. tuberculosis, and this was confirmed by the polymerase chain reaction (1). In another instance, a 37 year old man with past medical history of HIV infection had neurosyphilis coexisting with cryptococcal meningitis. The CSF was characterised by lymphocyte predominance, positive fluorescent treponemal antibody test and cryptococcal antigen titre of 1:640 (2). Another report involved a 40 year old man with coexisting neurosyphilis and cryptococcal meningitis. The CSF showed lymphocyte predominance and high protein concentration. Cryptococcus was cultured from the CSF and both serum serology and CSF were positive for syphilis (3). These anecdotal reports might underestimate the true prevalence of coe...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.