Download PDFPDF
Why diets fail: eating more, moving less
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Philip D Welsby
    Published on:
  • Published on:

    I was disappointed by this attempt to rebut my hypothesis.

    My hypothesis was not inchoate (OED “confused or incoherent”) as they obviously understood exactly what I wished to suggest – the conventional wisdom might be wrong or at least need some modification and that Carbon dioxide excretion may play a part in weight regulation.1

    We agree that the general public and health professionals are bewildered about weight regulation. That is not a reason to stop thinking and restate conventional wisdoms.

    We agree that “the majority of people they surveyed believed that that ”fat shed during weight loss was converted to energy rather than excreted as carbon dioxide and water.” That is not a reason to stop thinking and rely upon conventional wisdoms. I recall a paper that made the point that exhaled Carbon Dioxide might be relevant to fat loss.2 Indeed most people seem to assume that weight can be lost purely by energy production “raised metabolic rates” without a net excretion of heavy atoms but this is a conventional wisdom that is only correct in nuclear reactors in which E=mc2.

    Of course self –reporting of food intake is notoriously unreliable. But do we condemn as recidivists3 all those whose weigh loss plateaus on a diet? The same paper suggested a metabolic resistance to the maintenance of a reduced body weight. I merely provided a possible mechanism for this.

    We agree that “diets only succeed when the age-old advice to eat less and mov...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.