Responses

Download PDFPDF
Republished technology and guidelines: The diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure: review following the publication of the NICE guidelines
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Natriuretic peptide levels must be interpreted in the light of clinical probability of heart failure

    Given the recognition that "choosing appropriate thresholds[for serum natriuretic peptide] is problematic"(1), the best diagnostic strategy for obtaining maximum diagnostic "mileage" from natriuretic peptide levels might be that of interpreting any given result in the light of whether the patient has high, medium, or low clinical probability of heart failure. For that to come about, instead of reinforcing the idea that "In...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.