Responses

Download PDFPDF
Survey of major complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in the UK
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    commonsense, supervision, and other issues

    In addition to its use for "safe pleural intervention such as aspirating small effusions"(1), thoracic ultrasound(TUS), when compared with usual practice, has been shown to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax(odds ratio(OR) 0.3; 95% Confidence Interval(CI), 0.2 to 0.7)when utilised as an adjunct, not only to diagnostic thoracentesis(presumably in the context of small effusions), but also as an adjunct to therap...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.