Responses

Download PDFPDF

A systematic review of randomised clinical trials of individualised herbal medicine in any indication
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The evidence applies to all individualised herbal medicine

    In reply to Dr Koprowski's letter, we would like to point out that the absence of rigorous evidence supporting the efficacy of individualised herbal medicine shown by our systematic review remains fact - regardless of how the various types of individualised herbal medicine are categorised. If we had examined only individualised traditional oriental herbal medicine, we would have found even less evidence. If there is "act...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    A startling inadequacy in the links between the review evidence and the authors’ conclusions.

    Response to: R Guo, PH Canter, E Ernst. A systematic review of randomised clinical trials of individualised herbal medicine in any indication. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:633-637

    From: Ally Broughton Bsc (Hons) MNIMH Director of Research for, and Member of, the National Institute of Medical Herbalists (NIMH) Contact: ally.broughton@blueyonder.co.uk

    I am a trained herbal practitioner of 12 years and teach resea...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Oriental Medicine Doctors Licensed As Primary Care Providers in the U.S.

    Thank you, Peter Canter, for your e-letter in the Postgraduate Medical Journal.

    We find it somewhat shocking that you think herbal medicines are no better than a "placebo." This belies the facts.

    In America, in states like Florida, acupuncturists are licensed as "acupuncture physicians" and are considered by medical regulatory authorities to be primary care practitioners, who can also dispense herbs, a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Systematic review of individualised herbal medicine misunderstood
    • Peter H Canter, Research Fellow
    • Other Contributors:
      • Ruoling Guo, Edzard Ernst

    Dear Editors

    We thank E. J. Koprowski for her/his comments on our recent systematic review of individualised herbal medicine which reveal that s/he has totally misunderstood the nature of our review in several respects.

    Firstly, we were not at all interested in homeopathy as s/he seems to believe. We can only surmise that s/he is confusing homeopathy with Western medical herbalism which was included....

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Fatally Flawed Study Design in Herbal Medicine Review Article

    Dear Editors,

    A recent article, A systematic review of randomized clinical trials of individualized herbal medicine in any indication, published in October, 2007 in the Postgraduate Medical Journal, by R. Guo , P. H. Canter , E. Ernst, of the Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, Exeter, U.K., warns public health authorities that the effectiveness of individualized, herbal medicine...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.