Download PDFPDF
Primary care management of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome referred to surgeons: are non-operative interventions effectively utilised?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re: Carpal tunnel - Are non-operative interventions effectively utilised?

    The authors thank Henke Giele for his contribution to this discussion. We are pleased to see that he allows for some delaying of a curative operation in isolated cases when the inconvenience of the procedure and its recovery are untimely. He goes on to state that there is a correlation between severity of post-operative complaints and chronicity of symptoms and cites three papers that come to that conclusion. However...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Carpal tunnel - Are non-operative interventions effectively utilised?

    Yes, the poor use of non-operative interventions (as reported in this article) does indeed seem to be the effective use of these interventions that (the authors themselves acknowledge) are not curative but merely delay the curative operation.

    On both economic and patient parameters it is more economic to proceed directly with the curative intervention than waste resources and time attempting non-curative inter...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.