Download PDFPDF

Under-recognised paradox of neuropathy from rapid glycaemic control
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Neuropathy by overachieved rapid glycemic oral control
    • San M, Engineer Patient self

    Letter response to the article "Under-recognised paradox of neuropathy from rapid glycaemic control."

    I am a data point of what the author says is elusive example of neuropathy (albeit in initial stages) by rapid glycemic control using only oral medication.
    My A1c reduced by about 1 point ( 7.7 to 6.8) in 3 months and further down to 6.1 in 3 more subsequent months.

    From the initial 7.7 A1c date, I was started on a higher oral dosage, as well as serious diet modification.

    Two months later, I had a rapid onset of feet burning symptoms. The symptoms came on and off. With subsequent tighter diet control that included episodes of low glucose levels, feet burning was still present and became more frequent. After reading up on this subject and its counter intuitive conclusions, I loosened diet control and also had my doctor reverse the last medication increase to previous levels. This seems to have helped and my left foot has been free of burning for a few days now, and the right foot also improving. Continuing monitoring and hoping for the best. Thanks to your and similar articles for highlighting this controversial and elusive phenomenon.

    Conflict of Interest
    None declared

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Grounds for abandoning "diabetes" as a diagnosis?

    Dear Editor,

    Unlike peripheral tissues where insulin promotes, and indeed is necessary for cellular glucose uptake and utilisation, that is not true for the brain and presumably, therefore, peripheral nerves. The inference is that changes in the rate of glucose uptake by the brain and peripheral nerves are a function of its concentration in blood and are driven by mass action independently of insulin. In which ca...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.