The tumour associated CA-125 antigen is widely used in monitoring ovarian carcinoma. In women with a massive pleural effusion and ascites, markedly increased CA-125 levels may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Very high levels of tumour markers may be present in patients with benign pleural effusion, ascites, and chronic liver disease. Raised levels of tumour markers in serum or pleural fluid, in the absence of positive cytology, should be interpreted with caution.
- chronic liver disease
- pleural effusion
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
CA-125 is a high molecular mass glycoprotein expressed on the cell surface of some derivatives of embryonic coelomic epithelium. The tumour associated CA-125 antigen is widely used in monitoring ovarian carcinoma. Serum CA-125 levels are increased in ovarian cancer and decrease after effective treatment. Massive pleural effusion is often malignant in nature. It had been suggested that CA-125 titres (above 1000 U/ml) could differentiate benign from malignant conditions.1 We report the case of a woman with massive pleural effusion, ascites, weight loss, and a marked increase of serum CA-125 titres. The implications of CA-125 measurement in this case scenario are discussed.
A 44 year old woman was admitted with two month history of progressive dyspnoea, which had failed to improve with antibiotics. She was a smoker of 25 pack-years and had consumed alcohol in excess of 30 units a week for several years. Her sister had breast cancer. Examination revealed jaundice with stigmata of chronic liver disease, moderate right sided pleural effusion, and gross ascites. There were no breast masses or lymphadenopathy. Pleural fluid analysis revealed a transudate with normal glucose and amylase levels; scanty mesothelial cells, no malignant cells; and negative culture for bacteria and tuberculosis. Blood results showed increased mean corpuscular volume (102 fl) and deranged liver function tests (total bilirubin 97 μmol/l, aspartate aminotransferase 89 IU/l, γ-glutamyltransferase 592 IU/l, alkaline phosphatase 433 IU/l, albumin 25 g/l, globulin 49 g/l, and international normalised ratio 1.6). Serum iron studies, serum viral hepatitis screen, α1-antitrypsin, caeruloplasmin, antinuclear, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and liver autoantibodies were all within the normal range. An ultrasound scan of the abdomen showed cirrhosis with gross ascites. Cultures and cytology of repeated ascitic fluid samples were negative. Serum CA-125 was markedly increased (1987 U/ml) with normal serum carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9, and α-fetoprotein.
Three days after admission a massive increase in the size of the pleural effusion was associated with dyspnoea and marked hypoxia that required pleural fluid drainage. There was a reluctance to accept the patient on the intensive care ward in view of the markedly raised CA-125 level, family history of breast cancer, and marked pleural effusion and ascites despite negative fluid cytology. Computed tomography revealed no evidence of chest, abdominal or pelvic malignancy, and demonstrated cirrhotic nodules in the liver, normal ovaries, and bilateral areas of pneumonic consolidation consistent with an infective process. The patient was mechanically ventilated for a week, treated with broad spectrum antibiotics and diuretics, and pleural fluid drained through an intercostal tube. Four weeks later her jaundice had improved, ascites and pleural effusion had resolved, and serum CA-125 level had decreased to 393 U/ml. Two weeks later the patient developed nosocomial sepsis with hepatorenal syndrome and died. The relatives declined a postmortem examination.
Our patient had massive pleural effusion, ascites, and weight loss and was suspected to have an underlying malignancy based on high CA-125 titres. There was hesitation in offering intensive care treatment for her worsening respiratory failure. Subsequent investigations suggested cirrhosis with a negative liver screen; possibly alcohol induced cirrhosis. In a female patient, metastatic ovarian cancer may have a similar presentation and appropriate radiological and histological investigations, rather than tumour markers alone, should establish the diagnosis.
In a study of 328 patients, a CA-125 titre higher than 1000 U/ml was always due to the presence of cancer.1 Markedly raised serum and fluid CA-125 titres have been reported in benign conditions2 and represent production of the antigen in benign proliferating mesothelial cells. Increased serum CA-125 levels were detected in 52% of patients with hepatic diseases, in 100% of patients with non-gynaecological peritoneal carcinomatosis, and in 87% of patients with pleural effusion.3 Our patient had a combination of liver disease, ascites, and pleural effusion and this could have resulted in markedly increased CA-125 levels. Because of the high frequency of false positive results associated with many benign conditions, CA-125 is of little value as a screening test for ovarian carcinoma.
Pleural effusion with increased CA-125 levels may occur in pelvic conditions other than ovarian carcinoma. These include Meigs’ syndrome (secondary to ovarian fibroma)4 and pseudo-Meigs’ syndromes (secondary to other benign pelvic tumours).5 Removal of tumour is associated with a rapid decline in tumour markers. Increased CA-125 levels may occur with non-gynaecological malignancy such as lung cancer (69% with metastatic disease), mediastinal teratoma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.6 Tuberculosis is another cause of massive pleural effusion associated with increased levels of CA-125.7 Increased CA-125 levels may occur in connective tissue diseases, chronic constrictive pericarditis, and in patients on haemodialysis with pleural effusion.8
Pleural effusions are found in about 6% of patients with cirrhosis; two thirds of these are right sided. A large effusion in a cirrhotic, where there is no other explanation for its accumulation, is called a hepatic hydrothorax. It appears to form because of the movement of fluid from the abdomen through right sided diaphragmatic defects. Treatment is difficult as in many patients it is resistant to diuretics and dietary sodium restriction. Thoracocentesis usually leads to rapid reaccumulation of the effusion and a chest drain may be difficult to remove.9 Further options for treatment of a hepatic hydrothorax include surgical repair of the diaphragmatic defects, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), or liver transplantation if indicated.
The major limitation of our case report was the absence of postmortem proof that there was no ovarian cancer. However, the presence of an underlying ovarian cancer was judged to be extremely unlikely in view of the negative ultrasound and negative computed tomography findings, negative cytology of repeated ascitic and pleural and fluid samples, and the improvement of serum CA-125 levels without any form of cancer treatment.
The recommendation that routine testing of tumour markers in pleural fluid greatly increases diagnostic effectiveness and avoids the need for invasive diagnostic tests10 is not supported by our case report. Increased levels of tumour markers in pleural fluid, in the absence of positive cytology, should be interpreted with caution.