Download PDFPDF

Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for “left sided” colorectal symptoms
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Colorectal Investigations

    Dear Editor

    There are certain inconsistencies in the results. Twenty four procedures were abandoned due to poor bowel preparation but all 316 procedures have been presented in the results. Table 1 seems to be completely erratic as it lists Transverse Colon, Ascending Colon and Caecum as sites of advancement of the Sigmoidoscope. Moreover the number of procedures upto the Splenic flexure in the table do not add upto...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.