Article Text

A rare but important cause of focal hepatic lesions
  1. S Manjunatha,
  2. Y L Hockb,
  3. A R Cunningtonc
  1. aManor Hospital, Walsall, West Midlands, UK Department of Gastroenterology, bDepartment of Histopathology, cDepartment of Medicine
  1. Dr S Manjunath, Endoscopy Suite, Manor Hospital, Walsall WS2 9PS, UK

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A 57-year-old man presented with a 3-month history of right hypochondrial pain which was a constant dull ache often radiating to the back. There was no history of nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, jaundice or weight loss. Clinical examination was unremarkable apart from hepatomegaly; the liver was felt 2 cm below the right costal margin with a vertical span of 10 cm and was smooth, firm and non-tender. There were no signs of chronic liver disease. A basic haematological and biochemical screen was normal, with the exception of an isolated rise in γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) at 104 IU/l (normal 10–50 IU/l). He had not taken any hepatotoxic or enzyme-inducing drugs. His admitted alcohol intake was less than 15 units per week. An abdominal ultrasound (figure 1) and computed tomography (CT) (figure 2) were done. A liver biopsy was done under ultrasound guidance (figure 3). The patient was well after 6 months and had improved with symptomatic treatment.

Figure 1

Abdominal ultrasound


What are the findings on the abdominal ultrasound?
What are the findings on the abdominal CT scan?
What does the liver biopsy show?



The abdominal ultrasound (figure 1) shows abnormal liver parenchyma with multiple hyperechoic areas.


The abdominal CT scan (figure 2) shows multiple low attenuated areas in the liver. The appearances on the ultrasound and CT can easily be mistaken for multiple abscesses or metastases.


Liver biopsy shows dilated bile ducts lined by attenuated bland epithelium. Inspissated bile can be seen in one bile duct. These findings are consistent with bile duct microhamartomas or von Meyenburg complexes (VMC).


Bile duct microhamartomas were described by von Meyenburg in 1918.1 They are small, usually multiple, greyish hepatic nodules and result from the maldevelopment of ductal plates, thus explaining the similarities or association with congenital hepatic fibrosis, hepatic and choledochal cysts, polycystic kidneys, medullary sponge kidney, Caroli's disease, etc.2 The persistence or lack of remodelling of embryonic duct plates is an essential precursor of this lesion. Histologically, they are characterised by cystically dilated bile ducts lying in a collagenous stroma. The bile duct structures are lined by regular cuboidal epithelium and may contain bile plugs.3

VMC do not usually produce symptoms or abnormalities in liver function tests. The isolated rise in γ-GT in our patient, in the absence of an attributable cause such as alcohol, drugs, etc, can be regarded as non-specific. It is well known that sometimes even very high values of γ-GT can be seen without an obvious cause. The diagnosis of VMC is usually made at autopsy as an incidental finding. The lesions are not uncommon with a prevalence ranging from 0.7% to 2.8% in different autopsy series.3

The increasing use of ultrasound and CT has led to a rise in the diagnosis of VMC. The ultrasound appearance of VMC has been described as multiple hyper- or hypo-echoic areas.3 The CT appearance consists of multiple, irregular, small, low attenuated areas that do not normally enhance on contrast injection,4although exceptions have been reported.5 These appearances are likely to be mistaken particularly for hepatic abscesses or metastases. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bile duct hamartomas are hypointense on T1-weighted spin echo sequences and hyperintense on T2-weighted ones. Dynamic MRI (Gd-DTPA) displays a slow perfusion pattern in the nodules.5

It is probable that VMC will be more frequently recognised as ultrasound and CT are increasingly used in the diagnosis of abdominal diseases. Therefore, VMC should be included in the differential diagnosis of multiple hyper- or hypo-echoic lesions on radiological investigations, particularly if these lesions are seen in patients with otherwise good health and normal liver function tests. Interestingly, Lef-Toaff et al 6 reported 18 patients with primary extra-hepatic malignancy who had liver biopsy for evaluation of possible metastases which showed biliary hamartomas without any evidence of metastatic disease. The spectrum of findings varied from one or two circumscribed lesions to innumerable lesions of varying sizes from 2–15 mm.6 The final diagnosis, however, must be confirmed by liver histology. VMC can very rarely produce portal hypertension but these cases cannot be differentiated from congenital hepatic fibrosis.3 Some cases of cholangiocarcinoma have been reported in patients with VMC, suggesting that malignant change is possible, but this is very unusual.3 7

von Meyenburg complexes

  • von Meyenburg complexes are hepatic microhamartomas and are a part of a family of hepatic and renal fibropolycystic disorders

  • they are a relatively uncommon incidental finding and do not normally cause symptoms or disturbances in liver function

  • the histological appearances are specific, consisting of dilated bile ducts lined by attenuated epithelium with inspissated bile

  • abdominal ultrasound, CT, and MRI are used increasingly for diagnosis

In summary, VMC are normally asymptomatic, and are a chance finding at autopsy or during investigation for another disorder. They are a part of a family of fibropolycystic diseases and the diagnosis rests on histological confirmation.

Final diagnosis

von Meyenburg complexes or bile duct microhamartomas.


The authors wish to thank Dr CL Holland, Consultant Radiologist, for her assistance.