Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Residents’ narrative feedback on teaching performance of clinical teachers: analysis of the content and phrasing of suggestions for improvement
  1. Renée M van der Leeuw1,
  2. Mirjam P Schipper2,
  3. Maas Jan Heineman1,3,
  4. Kiki M J M H Lombarts1
  1. 1Professional Performance Research Group, Centre for Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Free University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3Board of Directors and Professional Performance Research Group, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Renée Martine van der Leeuw, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands; r.m.vanderleeuw{at}amc.uva.nl or reneevdl{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives High-quality teaching performance is important to ensure patient safety and encourage residents’ learning. This study aims to explore the content and phrasing of suggestions for improvement that residents provide to support excellent teaching performance of their supervisors.

Methods From February 2010 to November 2011, 577 residents were invited to evaluate 501 teachers from both surgical and medical residency training programmes from 20 hospitals. Feedback was collected through a validated formative feedback system named System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities. Two researchers independently coded the suggestions for improvement with literature-based coding schemes on (1) content and (2) linguistic characteristics. Besides these qualitative outcomes, descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS.

Results In total, 422 residents (73%) evaluated 488 teachers (97%), yielding 4184 evaluations. Of all teachers, 385 (79%) received suggestions for improvement focusing on teaching skills (TS), 390 (80%) on teaching attitude (TA) and 151 (31%) on personal characteristics. For 13%–47% of the suggestions for improvement, residents added (1) the location or situation where the observed TS or TA had taken place, (2) concrete examples of what teachers could do to improve or (3) (expected) effects of what the change in TS or TA would mean for residents.

Conclusions Residents provide mainly relevant suggestions for improvement that mirror important aspects of teaching performance. However, these comments often lack specific phrasing limiting their value for performance improvement. Therefore, residents are recommended to increase the specificity of the suggestions for improvement. The paper provides directions to phrase narrative feedback.

  • MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
  • HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT
  • QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.