Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Clinic and ambulatory heart rates in patients with ischaemic heart disease and/or chronic heart failure taking rate-limiting medications: are they interchangeable?
  1. Omar Javed1,
  2. Kenneth Koo1,
  3. Omar El-Omar1,
  4. Stuart Allen2,
  5. Alexander Squires3,
  6. Magdi El-Omar1,2
  1. 1Manchester Medical School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
  3. 3School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Magdi El-Omar, Department of Cardiology, Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; magdi.el-omar{at}cmft.nhs.uk

Abstract

Background The prognostic benefit from heart rate (HR) reduction in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and/or chronic heart failure (CHF) is now firmly established. Most decisions regarding initiation and/or dose adjustment of HR-limiting medications in such patients are based on clinic HR. Yet, this is a highly variable parameter that may not necessarily reflect HR control over the 24 h period.

Objective To examine the level of agreement between mean clinic and mean ambulatory HRs in patients with IHD and/or CHF taking rate-limiting medications.

Methods Prospective, observational study. Fifty patients with IHD and/or CHF who attended cardiology outpatient clinics at the Manchester Heart Centre and underwent same-day 24 h continuous ECG recording between March and October 2013 were included in the study. Mean clinic HR was compared with mean 24 h, daytime and night-time HRs. Limits-of-agreement plots were constructed to examine the relationship between the two HR measures in more detail.

Results The mean clinic HR was numerically similar to the mean HRs of all ambulatory time periods examined. However, on Bland–Altman plots, the limits of agreement between clinic and ambulatory HR means were quite wide, with the mean clinic HR ranging between 10.93 and 13.58 bpm below and 8.4 and 18.15 bpm above the mean ambulatory HR.

Conclusions Although numerically similar, the means of clinic and ambulatory HRs in patients with IHD and/or CHF display wide limits of agreement. As such, the two measures cannot be regarded as interchangeable.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.