Article Text

PDF
Health benefits from devolution in England: international lessons
  1. Yvonne Doyle1,2,
  2. Paul Johnstone3
  1. 1London Division, Public Health England, London, UK
  2. 2European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  3. 3Public Health England, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Yvonne Doyle, London Division, Public Health England, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London EC4Y 8JX, UK; Yvonne.doyle1{at}ntlworld.com, Yvonne.doyle{at}phe.gov.uk

Abstract

The Chancellor of the Exchequer's recent announcements to devolve decision making power from Whitehall to 30 English regions provide a challenge to use devolution to deliver more favourable health outcomes. However evaluation of devolved health models internationally is scarce, because it is rarely considered. Evidence from countries with long-standing experience of devolution finds that the best approaches are holistic, seeking fiscal freedoms to sustain the environment, promote health, well-being and citizen engagement. Overall, international outcomes are mixed, with some evidence of greater efficiency of care delivery but little hard evidence of better clinical outcomes or health status. Handling specialised services in a devolved health system is challenging. Regulation by national authorities is important to avoid gaming of the system by providers. Information from the devolved area is important in demonstrating equitable access. We present an evaluation framework and recommend that evaluation continues through governance of these deals during implementation.

  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • Health and care devolution

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.