rss
Postgrad Med J 2009;85:115-118 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2008.070607
  • Original article

Do older patients receive adequate stroke care? An experience of a neurovascular clinic

  1. Y-Y K Kee,
  2. W Brooks,
  3. A Bhalla
  1. St Helier Stroke Service, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carshalton, Surrey, UK
  1. Dr Y-Y K Kee, Elderly Care Medicine, Mayday University Hospital, 530 London Road, Croydon CR7 7YE, Surrey, UK; karenkee{at}doctors.org.uk
  • Received 12 April 2008
  • Accepted 3 November 2008

Abstract

Background: National guidelines and government directives have adopted policies for urgent assessment of patients with a transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke not admitted to hospital. The risk of recurrent stroke increases substantially with age, as does the potential benefit of secondary prevention. In order to develop effective strategies for older patients, it is important to identify how stroke care is currently provided for this patient group.

Methods: Between 2004 and 2006, older patients (>75 years) referred to a neurovascular clinic were compared with younger patients (≤75 years). Sociodemographic details, clinical features, resource use and secondary prevention in a neurovascular clinic were collected.

Results: Of 379 patients referred to the clinic, 129 (34%) were given a non-stroke diagnosis. Of the remaining 250 patients, 149 (60%) were ≤75 years. Median time from symptom onset to clinic appointment was similar for the two groups (24 (IQR 15–42) vs 24 (IQR 14–43) days; p = 0.58). Older patients were more likely to be in atrial fibrillation (10.1% vs 22.8%, p<0.001) and have lacunar stroke (34.7% vs 22.1%; p = 0.04). CT rates were similar in the two groups (27.8% vs 80.0%, p = 0.75). Scans were performed more quickly in younger patients (p<0.01). MRI scan rates were higher in younger patients (26% vs 4%, p<0.01), as was carotid Doppler imaging (92% vs 77%, p<0.01). There were no differences in prescribed secondary preventive treatments. Older patients experienced less delay for carotid endarterectomy (49 vs 90 days, p<0.01). Younger patients were more likely to be given advice on weight reduction (30.2% vs 12.9%, p<0.01) and diet (46.3% vs 31.7%, p = 0.02) than older patients.

Conclusions: Older patients were less likely to receive diagnostic investigations and lifestyle modification advice than younger patients. Guidelines need to be adopted to ensure prompt evidence-based stroke care in the outpatient setting.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of PMJ.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for PMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.