rss
Postgrad Med J 2008;84:609-612 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2008.068569
  • Original article

Radiation effects on the intima–media thickness of the common carotid artery in post-radiotherapy patients with head and neck malignancy

  1. M Shariat1,
  2. N A A Alias2,
  3. B M Biswal2
  1. 1
    Radiology Department, Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  2. 2
    Radiology Department, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
  1. Dr M Shariat, Radiology Department, Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; masoudshariat{at}gmail.com
  • Received 4 February 2008
  • Accepted 21 July 2008

Abstract

Background: Post-radiation large vessel injury has not received as much attention as microvascular irradiation injury. A few studies have shown that common carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) is increased after radiotherapy to the head and neck. However, in most of these studies, the irradiated subjects also had other major risk factors for atherosclerosis. In this study, irradiated subjects with major risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, history of previous cerebrovascular accident and connective tissue disorder were excluded.

Objective: To show in a cross-sectional study if radiotherapy to the carotid area has any effect on the IMT of the common carotid artery.

Subjects and methods: 13 patients with head and neck malignancies who had completed radiotherapy to the carotid region at least 1 year previously underwent ultrasound of the carotid artery. IMT measurements were compared with those of 13 healthy controls, matched for age, sex and race, with no history of radiotherapy.

Results: The irradiated subjects had significantly larger IMT measurements (mean 0.74 mm) than the non-irradiated subjects (mean 0.46 mm). The difference was significant (p<0.001) with a confidence interval of 95%.

Conclusions: This study shows that there is a measurable, significant (p<0.001) increase in IMT of the common carotid artery after radiotherapy for head and neck malignancy compared with non-irradiated matched controls. This knowledge is important for risk–benefit assessment of prophylactic or therapeutic neck irradiation. Increased awareness of this complication should provide an opportunity to intervene and prevent future cerebrovascular accidents in the majority of such patients.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Obtained.

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.