Article Text

PDF
Management of septic arthritis: a systematic review
  1. C J Mathews1,
  2. G Kingsley2,
  3. M Field3,
  4. A Jones4,
  5. V C Weston5,
  6. M Phillips6,
  7. D Walker7,
  8. G Coakley8
  1. 1
    Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2
    University Hospital Lewisham, Kings College London, Weston Education Centre, London, UK
  3. 3
    Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  4. 4
    Rheumatology Unit, City Hospital Trust, Nottingham, UK
  5. 5
    Department of Microbiology, University Hospital NHS Trust, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
  6. 6
    King’s College Hospital, London, UK
  7. 7
    Musculoskeletal Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  8. 8
    Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, UK
  1. Dr G Coakley, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Stadium Road, Woolwich, London SE18 4QH, UK; gerald.coakley{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence on the diagnosis and management of septic arthritis in native joints.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, National Electronic Library for Health, reference lists, national experts.

Review methods: Systematic review of the literature with evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected papers using defined criteria set out by the Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit of the Royal College of Physicians.

Results: 3291 citations were initially identified. Of these, 189 full text articles were identified for potential selection. Following review of these full text articles, 80 articles were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria and were included in the final list. Conclusions were drawn on the diagnosis, investigation and management of septic arthritis.

Discussion: Little good quality evidence exists to guide the diagnosis and management of septic arthritis. Overall, no investigation is more reliable in the diagnosis of septic arthritis than the opinion of an experienced doctor. Aspiration and culture of synovial fluid is crucial to the diagnosis, but measurement of cell count is unhelpful. Antibiotics are clearly required for a prolonged period, but there are no data to indicate by which route or for how long. Key unanswered questions remain surrounding the medical and surgical management of the infected joint.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethical approval was not required for this review.

  • Contribution: CJM conducted the literature search. GC and CJM independently reviewed the abstracts retrieved from the search and categorised for inclusion or exclusion according to the defined criteria. MF, AJ, VCW and MP evaluated the quality of the papers according to their specialist interests. DW and GK provided expert advice on the conclusions drawn from the papers. All authors and contributors reviewed and advised on the final manuscript.

  • This is a reprint of a paper that apperaed in Annals of the Rheumatic Disease, April 2007, volume 66, pages 440–5. Reprinted with kind permission of the authors and publisher.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.