Article Text

PDF
Incremental predictive value of vascular assessments combined with the Framingham Risk Score for prediction of coronary events in subjects of low–intermediate risk
  1. K-K Lau1,
  2. Y-H Chan1,
  3. K-H Yiu1,
  4. S Tam2,
  5. S-W Li3,
  6. C-P Lau1,
  7. H-F Tse1
  1. 1
    Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  2. 2
    Department of Clinical Biochemistry Unit, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  3. 3
    Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  1. Dr H-F Tse, Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; hftse{at}hkucc.hku.hk

Abstract

Background: In patients with low–intermediate risk, the use of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) may not allow accurate prediction of the occurrence of coronary events.

Objective: To determine whether non-invasive vascular sonographic assessments add value to the FRS for prediction of coronary events.

Methods: Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) and the presence of carotid plaque in 70 male subjects (mean (SD) age 62 (9) years) with a low–intermediate FRS who presented with a recent coronary event were evaluated and compared with those in 35 male controls matched for age (mean age 60 (9) years).

Results: Patients with a recent coronary event had a significantly higher FRS than controls. They had a significantly lower FMD (3.56 (2.41)% vs 5.18 (2.69)%, p = 0.003) and significantly higher prevalence of carotid plaque (67% vs 40%, p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in mean maximum IMT between the two groups (1.01 (0.28) vs 0.96 (0.14) mm, p = 0.32). Multivariate analysis revealed that FMD ⩽4.75% was an independent predictor of an acute coronary event. Of the three vascular markers, FMD ⩽4.75% and presence of carotid plaque provided the best diagnostic accuracy for a coronary event, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70 and 0.64 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.033), respectively, based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Furthermore, incorporating carotid plaque or FMD ⩽4.75% into the FRS (AUC = 0.72 and AUC = 0.78) provided incremental benefit in risk stratification over FRS alone (AUC = 0.66) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.007, for comparison of difference in two receiver operating characteristic curves).

Conclusions: Incorporating a measure of FMD or carotid plaque burden with FRS significantly increases the accuracy of predicting coronary events in subjects of low–intermediate risk and hence should be considered as additional investigations to improve coronary risk assessment.

  • Framingham risk score
  • flow-mediated dilatation
  • carotid plaque
  • coronary risk prediction

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was supported by the CRCG Small Project Funding of the University of Hong Kong (Project No 200507176137).

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.