Article Text

PDF
Importance of red patches diagnosed in cystoscopy for haematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms
  1. Herman Fernando,
  2. Sreenivasa S Thota,
  3. Glyn Burtt,
  4. Nicholas Waterfall,
  5. Imtiaz Husain
  1. Department of Urology, Bedford Hospital NHS Trust, Bedford, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Mr H Fernando
 Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK; herman.fernando{at}yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

Background: Biopsy of the red patches in the bladder, when found at cystoscopy, is routinely performed in urological practice. This is done to establish the sinister diagnosis of carcinoma-in-situ among other causes.

Objective: To analyse the pathology of the red patches and to determine if routine biopsy of these patches is warranted.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study conducted over a period of 36 months, in which 50 patients were identified, who underwent biopsies of their red patches. All patients with a history of bladder carcinoma and obvious bladder tumours were excluded from this study.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 60.8 years. 25 patients had cystoscopy for lower urinary tract symptoms, 21 for haematuria and 4 for recurrent urinary tract infection. Carcinoma in situ was found in 4 (8%) patients, of whom only 2 had positive urine cytology.

Conclusion: It is prudent to perform a biopsy of all incidentally diagnosed red patches because of a major yield rate of carcinoma in situ. This procedure also picks up other important pathologies, which help in further management.

  • CIS, carcinoma in situ
  • LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms
  • CIS
  • LUTS
  • red patches

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.