rss
Postgrad Med J 2005;81:55-57 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.020693
  • Original article

National review of urology outpatient practice in the UK

  1. P E Gilmore1,
  2. D C Shackley2,
  3. N W Clarke2,
  4. C D Betts1,
  5. K J O’Flynn1
  1. 1Department of Urology, Hope Hospital, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK
  2. 2Department of Urology, Hope Hospital, Salford and Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 MrPaul Gilmore
 Department of Urology, Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford, Greater Manchester M6 8HD, UK; paul.gilmore1tiscali.co.uk
  • Received 16 February 2004
  • Accepted 27 February 2004

Abstract

Objective: To audit the current UK outpatient workload and compare this to the national standards as set out by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) in A Quality Urological Service for Patients in the New Millennium published in October 2000.

Participants: 520 UK (NHS) and 21 Republic of Ireland (non-NHS) consultant urologists registered with BAUS in 2000.

Main outcome measures: Extent to which consultant urologists are able to comply with guidelines set out by their specialist association, the BAUS and by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Results: The questionnaire return rate was 61% (318/520; regional range 42%–75%). The median “routine” clinics/week was two (1–5) with a mean of 13 (1–40) new and 26 (7–80) follow ups. Fifteen percent (49/318) of consultants worked alone in clinic; of the remainder assistance included specialist registrar 67% (212/318), staff grade/associate specialist 32% (102/318), senior house officer 53% (172/318), and pre-registration house officer 2% (7/318). Only 21% (66/318; regional range 0%–46%) of responding consultants followed the BAUS recommendations for outpatient workload/manpower.

Conclusions: A minority of consultants are able to adhere to the outpatient workload guidelines as set out by BAUS council in 2000. In addition, there appears to be significant variations within and between training regions. Development of this project into a regional audit tool may allow intraregional guideline formation governing hospital outpatient workload.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Services

    1. Email this link to a friend
    2. Alert me when this article is cited
    3. Alert me if a correction is posted
    4. Alert me when eletters are published
    5. Article Usage Statistics
    6. Similar articles in this journal
    7. Similar articles in Web of Science
    8. Similar articles in PubMed
    9. Add article to my folders
    10. Download to citation manager
    11. Request permissions

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
     This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of PMJ.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for PMJ. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.