Transfer of hospitals and “additional premises” to the state: questionable morality in the implementation of the National Health Service Act (1946)

Abstract

The National Health Service Act of 1946, pioneered by Aneurin Bevan, came into being on the “appointed day”, 5 July 1948. Hospitals with their “additional premises” throughout Britain were “seized” by the state and incorporated into this vast socialist enterprise. While the majority of the population welcomed this new initiative in the creation of a welfare state, associated with medical care from cradle to grave, not all (especially members of various Hospital Boards of Management) were so enthusiastic. The hospitals for “incurables” (long stay patients) were unhappy and lost a vast proportion of their income owing to a great deal of procrastination; but most of them ultimately managed to escape nationalisation after a prolonged period of negotiation, by a claim that they were “homes” rather than “hospitals”. The confiscation of property which had been built as a result of voluntary subscription was another huge and highly contentious matter, which has been highlighted in recent years. The future of the Seamen’s Hospital Society’s properties represents a good example of this.