rss
Postgrad Med J 2004;80:607-609 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2003.017863
  • Original article

Therapeutic impact of percutaneous spinal biopsy in spinal infection

  1. J J Rankine1,
  2. D A Barron1,
  3. P Robinson1,
  4. P A Millner2,
  5. R A Dickson2
  1. 1Department of Clinical Radiology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
  2. 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr James J Rankine
 Department of Clinical Radiology, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; james.rankineleedsth.nhs.uk
  • Received 8 December 2003
  • Accepted 16 January 2004

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic impact of percutaneous spinal biopsy in patients with suspected spinal infection.

Design and patients: A review of the case notes and imaging features of 36 patients who underwent percutaneous spinal biopsy was performed. From this group 20 patients with a prebiopsy diagnosis of spinal osteomyelitis were identified. Management before biopsy was noted including the use of antimicrobial therapy. The results of the histology and microbiology were noted along with the subsequent diagnosis and management.

Results: Eight of the 20 patients (40%) had received antibiotics before the biopsy. An organism was isolated in 8/20 cases (40%). Of the eight patients on antibiotics, two grew an organism (25%), including one case of candida in a patient receiving flucloxacillin. Out of 12 patients not on antibiotics there were six cases where an organism was isolated (50%). The result of the biopsy led to a change in management in seven of the 20 patients (35%).

Conclusions: Many clinicians are treating spinal osteomyelitis empirically with antibiotics before biopsy, but this reduces the chance of isolating an organism and determining antibiotic sensitivity. Despite this biopsy led to a change in management in 35% of cases.

Footnotes

    Responses to this article

    • Where is Analysis?
      • Emmanuel M Bhaskar
      Postgrad Med J published online December 13, 2004

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.