How well do we investigate patients with suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage? The continuing need for cerebrospinal fluid investigations
- 1Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- 2Barnsley District Hospital, Barnsley, UK
- 3Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Correspondence to: Professor Paul D Griffiths Academic Unit of Radiology, Floor C, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; P.GriffithsSheffield.ac.uk
- Received 30 January 2003
- Accepted 17 May 2003
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the extent of compliance with established guidelines for the investigation of suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and the implications of non-compliance.
Design: Prospective observational study of practice in three hospitals in the Trent region.
Setting: One teaching hospital with a tertiary neuroscience referral centre and two large district general hospitals.
Participants: 50 consecutive patients from each centre referred for suspected SAH with negative computed tomography.
Main outcome measures: Diagnosis of SAH confirmed or excluded according to guidelines.
Results: When the data from the three centres were combined (n = 150 computed tomography negative cases) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) investigation was not performed in 60/150 (40%). In the 90 cases where CSF studies were performed SAH was confirmed in 11 (12%).
Conclusion: There is significant non-compliance in following the established guidelines for the investigation of SAH at the centres studied. As the primary cause of non-traumatic SAH is ruptured aneurysm, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality from second haemorrhage, this highlights a major source of concern for clinical governance.







