Statistics from Altmetric.com
The menopause, the last menstrual period, marks the end of a continuum of declining physiological fertility. Decreased fertility in relative or absolute terms antedates the menopause by 10–15 years. The climacteric is the period of time (about 4–5 years) around the menopause during which ovarian function is gradually compromised. By the turn of the 20th century life expectancy in women of the Western world was about 58 years, at present it is about 82, but as the mean age of the menopause, 51 years, has not changed more than one third of a woman's life is expected beyond the menopause. This is the first time in human history where long postmenopause existence is witnessed on such a scale. More importantly, the disability-free life expectancy, between the ages of 50 and 60, for the whole population, largely due to cardiovascular disease and arthritis, has not changed over the last 30 years.1 For either gender, ageing is the primary factor influencing disabilities related to cardiovascular disease, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, visual and hearing problems. As far as women are concerned it is expected that more such disabled women will live after the menopause, which is increasingly found to be a confounding variable and the treatment of which may profoundly influence the clinical progress of such disabilities. With the expected increase in postmenopausal population over the next 30 years, the health issues modulated by the menopause have moved from a peripheral medical interest into a central health care programme that commands a different strategy for resource allocation and for service delivery.
Pathophysiology of the menopause
From the age of 35 years onwards there is a progressive increase in the level of follicle stimulating hormone indicating a reduced amount of effective oestradiol and inhibin B production.2In an elegant study, which combined data from other reports, the ovarian content of primordial follicles sustains a sharp decline at about the age of 37 (see fig 1).3 4 Should this rapid decline in the number of primordial follicles not occur, could menstruation be predicted to continue until the age of 70?
The source of oestradiol and inhibin B is the granulosa cell layer, which lines the growing primordial follicles. As the number of gonadotrophin responsive primordial follicles decline, and consequently the number of growing granulosa cells, symptoms and signs of oestrogen deficiency start to develop, although the dramatic biochemical and tissue structural changes in women appear soon after the menstrual periods cease completely. Due to the hypergonadotrophic state, steroidogenesis continues in the ovarian stroma and theca cells, with an increased production of androgens, particularly androstenedione and testosterone, and to a lesser extent dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulphate (DHEA and DHEAS), which are peripherally converted into oestrone, the predominant albeit weak circulating oestrogen in the postmenopause.
Effects of oestrogen deficiency (see box 1)
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
The ubiquitous distribution of the oestrogen receptors in many parts of the central nervous system5 may explain the wide spectrum of symptoms, which result from oestrogen deprivation. Oestrogens regulate the synthesis and the rate of release of many neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, and particularly the noradrenergic transmission in the medulla oblongata and the hypothalamus. Oestrogen increases sensory perception, locomotor activity, limb coordination, and balance.6 Oestrogen deficiency reduces serotonin synthesis in the brain, which may contribute to the development of insomnia.7 8 In addition oestrogen replacement treatment has been associated with a reduction in the incidence of Alzheimer's disease.9 10
One of the immediate effects of oestrogen deficiency is the instability of the thermoregulatory centre located in the hypothalamus with the consequent development of hot flushes and sweating (vasomotor symptoms). The hot flush results from sudden vasodilatation of skin capillaries, which typically affects the chest area and spreads upward to the facial skin; there is an increase in skin temperature by about 1–2oC. This hot flush lasts for less than a minute and is usually followed by perspiration. The majority of women experience vasomotor symptoms of varying degrees of frequency and severity, and as many as 25%–50% will continue to suffer from these symptoms at five years after the menopause. The quality of life may be severely compromised by the presence of menopausal symptoms, which are easily cured by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). It is essential to appreciate that the absence of vasomotor symptoms does not reflect a lesser susceptibility to develop the degenerative changes elsewhere in the body as a result of the menopause.
The loss of oestrogen supply affects the lower genital tract. This results in thinning of the vaginal epithelium (fig 2), and reduction in vaginal transudates, which causes vaginal dryness and dyspareunia. There is also reduction in the supporting collagen.
A decrease in cervical mucus may further contribute to the symptom of vaginal dryness. The endometrium becomes atrophic. Ligamentous support to the uterus, cervix, and vagina undergo atrophy, which may present clinically as genital prolapse.
Atrophy of the urothelium of the trigone of the bladder and of the urethra makes these areas more sensitive to the irritating effect of urine, causing urgency, frequency, and dysuria.
Box 1: Symptoms associated with the climacteric and postmenopausal years
ACUTE CONSEQUENCES OF OESTROGEN DEFICIENCY
Vasomotor symptoms • Hot flushes. • Sweats. • Insomnia. • Palpitations.
Psychological symptoms • Mood changes. • Anxiety. • Loss of memory. • Loss of concentration. • Irritability.
Reproductive tract symptoms • Vaginal dryness. • Loss of libido. • Dyspareunia.
Urinary symptoms and urethral syndrome
CHRONIC CONSEQUENCES OF OESTROGEN DEFICIENCY
Skeletal disease: osteoporosis.
Cardiovascular diseases and strokes.
As a result of the ageing process as well as hypo-oestrogenaemia, the skin sustains a reduction in the amount of collagen with thinning of the dermis and consequently promotes the development of wrinkles and appearance of lines. The use of oestrogen increases dermal thickness mainly due to an increase in collagen thickness, which retains more water.11 12
Increased osteoclastic activity supervenes within 6–8 weeks of the loss of oestrogen, and as a result a number of biochemical changes may be observed:
Reduction in serum level of osteocalcin.
Increase in urinary hydroxyproline: creatinine ratio.
Increase in renal leakage of calcium.
Reduction in intestinal absorption of calcium.
Osteoporosis is a condition marked by a reduction in bone mass, either due to reduced bone formation or accelerated bone resorption. Bone remodelling is a continuous process of resorption and bone formation, with activated bone resorption being the main feature of oestrogen deficiency. The main morphological change in osteoporosis is the loss of collagenous framework, which constitutes the bone microarchitecture (fig 3). In the postmenopausal population it is manifested by a progressive reduction in height, development of dorsal kyphosis (dowager's hump), and by the high incidence of low trauma fractures of the distal radius, vertebral compression, and fractures of the neck of the femur.
The life time risk of osteoporotic fractures for a 50 year old white man is 2% for vertebral fractures, 2% for distal radius fracture, and 3% for femoral neck fractures; the corresponding figures for a woman of the same age and ethnicity are 11%, 13%, and 14%, respectively.13 Therefore, more than one third of women will sustain one or more osteoporotic fracture in their lifetime. The maximum bone mass is attained at the age of 30, followed by a plateau for 5–10 years, whereafter age related bone loss of about 0.5% per annum, ensues.14 15 At the menopause, a phase of accelerated bone loss of about 4% per annum has been recognised, which affects mainly cancellous bones, and lasts for about four years.14 16 Afterwards, the annual rate of bone loss slows back to 1%.17 By the age of 80, a non-hormonally replaced woman will have lost 30%–50% of her bone mass. A reduction of bone density by 1 standard deviation (SD), in the hip for example, increases the risk of hip fractures by 2.6-fold.18 Femoral neck fractures carry a 15% fatality within three months and are associated with a high disability rate in survivors. Women of north western European extraction, Asian, and oriental women accrue a lower bone density during their lifetime and are therefore more susceptible to osteoporosis after the menopause, when compared with Afro-Caribbean or Mediterranean women.
Oestrogen effects on bone metabolism
Reduction in interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 production in bone remodelling units.19
Induction of apoptosis in osteoclasts.20
Stimulation of bone formation by the increased production of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, and transforming growth factor-β.21
Increased synthesis of calcitonin.22
Increased vitamin D receptor expression in osteoblasts.23
Measurement of bone mass
Osteoporosis is an asymptomatic disease until its late stages, and therefore early detection is necessary to prevent its development. There are several techniques to measure bone mass which include ultrasound scan of the os calcis, single energy absorptiometry, dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DEXA; see fig4), and computed tomography. The quantitative ultrasound method may be suitable for screening to predict osteoporotic fracture risk,24 25 but may have limitations in the follow up assessment of response to treatment. Computed tomography, while providing a volumetric assessment of bone density, has the disadvantage of high radiation dose and high costs. The single energyx ray absorptiometry offers high precision with a low dose of radiation at appendicular sites—namely, the distal radius and os calcis. DEXA allows measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine, hip, total body, and at the appendicular sites, and offers a more precise measurements by allowing for soft tissue interference.
The organic matrix of bone is impregnated with calcium salts in the form of hydroxyapatite. The bone mineral content correlates with the mechanical strength of bone, and is usually measured by its estimation per unit area in the bone examined: BMD, expressed as g/cm2.
Box 2: Causes of osteoporosis
Metabolic and endocrine aetiology • Hypogonadism. • Hyperadrenocorticism. • Thyrotoxicosis. • Hyperparathyroidism.
Nutritional deficiencies • Vitamin D deficiency. • Alcoholism. • Malabsorption syndrome. • Chronic liver disease.
Drug induced • Chronic corticosteroids use. • Chronic heparin therapy.
Since bone mass is nearly normally distributed in a given healthy population, at peak bone mass it has become customary to express BMD in terms of SD units around the mean. A threshold range for osteopenia is a BMD between −1.0 to −2.49 SD units and the threshold for osteoporosis is a BMD lower than −2.5 SD units below that of young healthy adults (T score). When the number of SD units, which denote the BMD, is compared to age matched control, the Z score is derived (figs 5and 6). Upon the diagnosis of osteoporosis causes other than oestrogen deficiency should be considered and appropriate investigations instituted (box 2).
Oestrogen deficiency results in several changes in the cardiovascular system:
Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is the most common cause of death in women over the age of 55, and accounts for about 25% of deaths. The menopause is an independent risk factor for IHD, the overall relative risk for IHD in the menopause is 2.7 and this risk rises with younger age at menopause.26 In women with a previous myocardial infarction, ever-use of oestrogen significantly reduces age adjusted mortality from a repeat myocardial infarction to 0.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.61).27 The relative risk for cardiovascular disease in women on oestrogen replacement remains 0.65 even after adjustment for other risk factors: previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, cholesterol, body mass index, age, education.28
There are structural and functional changes in the heart following the menopause:
Reduced stroke volume.29
Reduced cardiac output.30
Left ventricular hypertrophy: posterior wall and septum thickness increases by 10% within five years after the menopause.31
Higher incidence of “ischaemia minor” in the electrocardiograms of oophorectomised women.32
A reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular disease including cerebrovascular accidents, and will therefore have the greatest potential to influence the life expectancy of women. Preventing myocardial ischaemia, non-fatal infarctions, and cerebrovascular insufficiency ranks among the most important ways of increasing the “disability-free life expectancy” of women.
The incidence of hypertension is significantly higher in hypo-oestrogenic postmenopausal women when compared with women receiving oestrogen replacement therapy after adjustment for age, race, and weight.33 Postmenopausal oestrogen replacement treatment reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure in women, and this effect is not dose related. In addition, oestrogen reduces the stress induced rise in blood pressure. The arterial vasodilatory effect of oestrogen may be a crucial mechanism in modulating its cardiovascular protective effects, whether that is due to increased prostacyclin production,34 calcium channel blockade,35 or endothelium independent vasorelaxation.36
The effect of oestrogen on blood pressure has been reported in many publications. A rise of blood pressure, as measured by the conventional sphygmomanometer, was documented by some37 while others ascribed the rise to the type of oestrogen used.38 Others failed to demonstrate a change in blood pressure with oestrogen therapy in normotensive or in hypertensive women.39 40 A reduction in blood pressure was documented in a double blind cross over study of conjugated equine oestrogens and placebo.41Automated ambulatory blood pressure measurement is a useful technique to overcome the problem of white coat hypertension, and gives a number of readings throughout a 24 hour period. In a comparative study that evaluated the mean change in daytime and night-time systolic and diastolic blood pressure in oophorectomised women there was a consistent drop in systolic and diastolic blood pressure during the day and night. This trend was statistically significant in women treated with transdermal oestradiol compared with oral oestrogen after six months of observation.42 After oral administration of oestrogen the induction of angiotensinogen through the first pass effect on the liver has been proposed but this was not substantiated in the literature. Certain gene polymorphisms may be responsible for the development of high blood pressure in some oestrogen users, however, this has not yet been documented.
Effects of oestrogens on blood vessels
Postmenopausal oestrogen therapy results in acceleration of blood flow in the aorta,43 reduced peripheral vascular resistance,44 and a significant increase in the pulsatility index in the carotid arteries.45
Postmenopausal oestrogen supplement delays the onset of exercise induced ST-depression and improved exercise tolerance in women with angiographically confirmed coronary heart disease,46 and angiographic studies have shown a reduced coronary artery occlusion risk in oestrogen users.47
Cerebrovascular effect of oestrogen
A sex difference exists in cerebral blood flow being greater in the premenopause than in age matched males, but it declines to equality after the menopause.48 Oestrogen treatment in the postmenopause reduces resistance in the internal carotid artery45 and middle cerebral artery.49 In another study the use of unopposed oestrogen in women with established carotid artery atheromas resulted in a reduction of 28% plaque length and 18% of plaque thickness after six months of treatment.50
The disturbance in lipid metabolism ranks highly among the identified risk factors of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Raised serum total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations have been identified to have a linear positive relationship, and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol was found to have an inverse relationship to the risk of coronary heart disease.
There are sex differences in lipid profile, which in women is profoundly affected by hormonal changes. Before the menopause, women have a less atherogenic lipid profile, but the changes in lipoprotein metabolism in postmenopausal women have been associated with the increased cardiovascular mortality. This risk has been shown to decline with the lowering of serum cholesterol.51
After the menopause, women retain their higher level of HDL-cholesterol, but this is counteracted by a higher level of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol than in men. About half the patients with coronary artery disease have reduced HDL-cholesterol levels; the commonest lipoprotein abnormality. Consequently, elevation of HDL-cholesterol by oestrogen treatment should be viewed as an important vehicle for the cardioprotection effect of this hormone. Oestrogen reduces LDL oxidation and therefore interferes with its uptake by monocytes and tissue macrophages, a particularly important step in the development of atherosclerosis. The significance of raised serum triglycerides as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease is still controversial. About 30%–50% of the cardioprotective effects of oestrogens has been attributed to the changes in LDL and HDL. When lipoprotein subfractions are analysed, a low risk profile is characterised by a low LDL-cholesterol, and a raised HDL-cholesterol, particularly the HDL2 subfraction, while the level of the LDL-cholesterol is positively related to the risk of IHD.51
Apoproteins are important for the transport of lipids and their uptake in peripheral tissues, and are important independent predictors of cardiovascular disease risk. Epidemiological data have linked apoprotein B (Apo B) with cerebrovascular disease while Apo A1 is inversely related to the risk. Lipoprotein a, Lp (a), has been identified as an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and IHD,52 although the underlying mechanism has not yet been clearly defined. Oestrogen replacement treatment in postmenopausal women reduces Lp(a) levels.53
An apparently beneficial effect of HRT on the risk of cardiovascular disease is probably mediated through a favourable effect on the lipid profile. In addition, oestrogen reduces central obesity, and together both reduce the insulin concentrations. Indeed, current oestrogen use may reduce the risk of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus by 20%.54
Oestrogen deficiency is associated with increase in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, Lp(a), and reduction in HDL-cholesterol.55 Oestrogen replacement reverses these changes. Progestins may increase the activity of hepatic lipoprotein lipase and therefore increases the catabolism of HDL2, with the result of lowering the levels of HDL2 and HDL-cholesterol.56 In addition, oestrogen with cyclically administered progestogen has little or no effect on triglycerides.53 When a progestogen is used in a continuous combined fashion along with oestrogen, as an amenorrhoea regimen, HDL levels were reduced, however.57
CHANGES IN COAGULATION FACTORS
The menopause results in changes in coagulation factors, with increases in fibrinogen,58 plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1),59 factor VIIc,60 and antithrombin-III (AT-III).61 Oestrogen replacement treatment is associated with increases in plasminogen, platelet count, factor VII, factor IX, factor X, factor XI, protein C, and von Willebrand's factor. Oestrogen replacement treatment is associated with reductions in fibrinogen, AT-III, prothrombin time, tissue plasminogen activator, PAI-1, platelet aggregation time, and protein S.62
The interaction between these factors is also governed by a large buffering capacity to compensate, within limits, the effects of any derangement in individual protein. Thus the predictive value of future occurrence of venous thrombosis as a result of oestrogen replacement treatment, by measuring each individual clotting factor is restricted to the finding of gross abnormalities only. Therefore one has to rely on the epidemiological data, which have shown that there is a very small increase in the risk of venous thrombosis as a result of HRT use, an excess of 1:5000.63 64 These studies suggest that the risk of venous thromboembolism is greater during the first year, which then declines over the following two years and becomes not significantly different from controls after three years of use. Patients found to have protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance such as those with factor V Leiden gene phenotype, require careful assessment of the risks and benefits of HRT, which have to be considered and tailored to the individual needs before embarking on treatment.
The HERS Study
The Heart Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) was a randomised placebo controlled study of continuous combined conjugated oestrogens (0.625 mg) plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate for the secondary prevention of IHD in women with established diagnosis of IHD.65 In contrast to the investigators' expectation there was an increase of IHD events in the treated group compared with the placebo group during the first two years of the study. However, when the first two years were free from intercurrent IHD, there was a trend towards a beneficial effect in the treated group.66
This trial was a landmark in this field but unfortunately suffered from a number of pitfalls, which raised more questions than it could answer. The recruitment period was extended with the majority of patients enrolled towards the end of the 18 month period, and the observation time was thus reduced to a mean of 4.1 as opposed to 4.75 years in the initial description of the protocol. Moreover, the incidence of IHD events in the placebo group was 3.3%, which is significantly lower than the expected incidence of 5%. Such factors clearly undermine the statistical power of the study.
The study design lacked an oestrogen only group and included only one type of progestin. The choice of the progestin and the duration of its administration might have played another factor in the results of the HERS report. Medroxyprogesterone acetate has been shown to adversely affect coronary arteries in monkeys.67 68
The prothrombotic potential of women who experienced IHD events was not determined and in particular the geno typing for factor V Leiden. Factor V Leiden mutation has also been linked to arterial disease.69
Diagnosis of the menopause
The majority of postmenopausal women who present to their doctors requesting help are suffering from hot flushes and sweating and vaginal dryness. A few present wishing to prevent osteoporosis or coronary heart disease. The diagnosis of the menopause depends on the presence of typical symptoms (above), amenorrhoea for >12 months, or when the clinical picture is not as clear cut a serum level of follicle stimulating hormone in excess of 30 IU/l confirms the diagnosis.
In women who are still menstruating, the differential diagnosis includes the premenstrual syndrome especially when associated with symptoms of the climacteric. Endogenous depression is another consideration in the differential diagnosis. Rarely, vasomotor symptoms may be associated with the carcinoid syndrome, pheochromocytoma or hyperthyroidism, but other manifestations and the characteristic biochemical changes associated with these three conditions should establish the relevant diagnosis.
Follicle stimulating hormone and oestradiol concentrations are not required for routine diagnosis, but they may be of help to establish the diagnosis of ovarian failure in atypical cases, in the follow up of incomplete response to treatment, or in the case of conserved ovaries after hysterectomy.
Assessment of ovarian reserve had been attempted to predict the diagnosis of the menopause using the clomiphene citrate challenge test70 and the gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist test,71 but these functional tests were not found to be reliable (see review by Gulekli et al 72).
Treatment of the menopause
The principle of HRT involves the administration of oestrogen, which provides symptom relief, reverses the changes in calcium metabolism, and improves lipoprotein metabolism. Oestradiol and oestrone are fat soluble molecules and therefore not readily absorbed from the gut except if the steroid is micronised (particle size <1 μ) or if the oestrogens are esterified to a carrier salt that makes them more water soluble. An example of the latter includes oestradiol valerate, which is quickly metabolised in the liver into oestradiol and valeric acid, 12-C fatty acid. Another example is ethinyl oestradiol but because of its resistance to intracellular 17β dehydrogenase it exerts a sustained activity, and is therefore not a suitable preparation for postmenopausal HRT.
Oral administration of oestrogens is subjected to the first pass effect of the liver with rapid conjugation to glucoronates and sulphates. Oestradiol is rapidly converted to the weaker oestrone. Oral therapy usually succeeds in building up a satisfactory serum oestradiol levels. The transdermal preparations form a theoretically safer way to administer oestrogens but suffer from limitations of skin absorption in at least 50% of instances and in the potential of skin reactions to the adhesive material in the patch. Alternatively the application of oestradiol in gel formulation rubbed over the skin may overcome this; nevertheless, serum oestradiol levels may still be lower than with oral treatment. The subcutaneous insertion of oestradiol pellets involves a surgical procedure, associated with mounting high serum oestradiol levels, and as such is responsible for the development of tachyphylaxis in a large number of women. The vaginal route is effective in delivering oestrogens, useful when a restricted effect to the vagina is required; however, the type and dose of oestrogens used can result in significant serum levels.
The side effects of oestrogens are:
Oral administration of oestrogen may cause nausea and gastric irritation.
Breast tenderness, usually dose related, but it usually settles down within 3–4 months.
Headaches may be aggravated.
The average daily doses of oestrogen depicted in table 1 are those derived from the literature for the provision of adequate control of symptoms. Box 3 lists measures for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. The dose may be increased to overcome residual vasomotor symptoms.
Box 3: Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Oestrogen: natural not synthetic. Continuous not cyclical. Minimum bone sparing dose.
Progestins (in women with an intact uterus).
Cyclical: minimum 12 days, with the minimum endometrium protecting dose. Continuous combined HRT.
(2) Non-oestrogen treatment of bone loss
Raloxifene (selective oestrogen receptor modulator).
(3) Additional measures
Weight bearing exercise.
Adequate ultraviolet exposure.
Vitamin D >400 IU daily.
Dietary calcium intake 1 g daily.
NEED FOR A PROGESTOGEN
The continuous administration of oestrogen causes progressive proliferation of the endometrium. Such stimulation may lead to the development of endometrial hyperplasia, or even carcinoma of the endometrium,73 and therefore oestrogen only therapy can be given safely only to women who have had a hysterectomy.
Over the last 40 years progestogens have been introduced to offset the effect of continuous oestrogen stimulation of the endometrium. A progestogen is administered cyclically for 12–14 days every month and this regimen is usually followed by menstrual discharge. Alternatively, the progestogen may be used continuously alongside the oestrogen, the aim being to induce amenorrhoea. There is a wide variation in bioavailability and individual tissue concentration of different progestogens, making it difficult to derive relative potencies between various compounds. This is also noted in the variation of the incidence and severity of adverse effects between different individuals.
The main adverse effects associated with the use of progestogens are:
The development of premenstrual tension type of symptoms: fluid retention, bloatedness, cyclical mastalgia, weight gain.
Acne and seborrhoea.
Progesterone is poorly absorbed from the gut and by micronising the crystals (particle size <1 μ) its absorption may be enhanced, but in view of the rapid deactivation it needs to be administered in divided doses, and is associated with poor cycle control. Hence, synthetic steroids with progestogenic activity have been introduced in clinical practice, which showed a better absorption and bioavailability compared with the natural progesterone. There are two main derivations for the synthetic progestins available: removal of the carbon atom from testosterone and placing an ethinyl group in the C-17 position, or by adding an acetyl group to position C-17 of the progesterone molecule. The former group possesses higher androgenic activity than the latter but is associated with a better menstrual control. Most progestogens are subjected to the first pass effect of the liver, and they adversely affect the lipoprotein profile. However, when progestogens are added sequentially to oestrogens their potential for causing an atherogenic lipid profile is reduced. They are quickly eliminated, and daily doses are required. Progesterone and progestogens act by:
Down-regulation of oestrogen receptor expression.
Increasing the catabolism of oestradiol.
Inhibition of oestradiol mediated oncogene transcription.
The duration of progestogen use rather than its dose seem to be the important factor in the secretory transformation of the endometrium. However, higher doses of the progestogen may be required to improve cycle control, but this may also increase the incidence and severity of premenstrual tension type of symptoms.
This is a synthetic steroid, described to have a combination of activities including weak oestrogenic, weak progestogenic, and weak androgenic actions. It may be used alone as a supplement for postmenopausal women to reduce vasomotor symptoms and to reduce postmenopausal bone loss. The rate of increase in BMD is estimated at about 1.5%–2% over two years of use, and therefore is less effective than oestrogen. It may help to alleviate vasomotor symptoms without causing mastalgia, but is also associated in some women with the development of bloating, fluid retention, and psychological symptoms similar to those of premenstrual tension. It is an amenorrhoeic regimen and does not cause uterine bleeding in the majority of users. However, while the total cholesterol is reduced as a result of treatment, the HDL-cholesterol level is also reduced and more profoundly compared with the continuous combined HRT regimen.57 It is administered in a daily dose of 2.5 mg. It is indicated in women who have passed the menopause, who do not wish to bleed, or in those with contraindications to the use of oestrogen.
Selective oestrogen receptor modulators are a family of compounds found to exert oestrogenic effects in certain body tissues but not others. Raloxifene, a non-steroidal benzothiaphene, is chemically related to tamoxifen. Both raloxifene and tamoxifen bind the oestrogen receptors and show mixed agonist and antagonist activity in different oestrogen responsive tissues. Both drugs reduce bone turnover and modulate hepatic globin synthesis, in a manner similar to oestrogen. Raloxifene, however, does not stimulate the uterus, unlike tamoxifen, which acts as a partial oestrogen agonist on the uterus. Raloxifene is metabolised by the liver and undergoes extensive enterohepatic cycling. Raloxifene is orally administered as a daily dose of 60 mg.
Raloxifene has been shown to reduce markers of bone turnover and may result in an increase of vertebral BMD by about 1.2%–1.6% per annum,74 therefore it is less effective than oestrogen. However, there are no data directly comparing the two treatments. There appears to be no endometrial stimulatory effect of raloxifene compared with controls in terms of ultrasound measured endometrial thickness or the incidence of uterine bleeding.75 Raloxifene may reduce serum cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels, similar to HRT, but does not affect the HDL-cholesterol levels or triglycerides, which rise by 11%–20% with HRT.76
Raloxifene seems to be devoid of breast stimulatory effect and claims have been made to a lower incidence of developing new breast cancers during treatment for up to three years.77 However, there is an increase in the incidence of vasomotor symptoms with raloxifene treatment. Also reported is an increased risk of thromboembolism, to the same extent as that of HRT, and development of leg cramps. Clearly this preparation is indicated in women who have passed the menopause, who do not complain of vasomotor symptoms, and who are at an increased risk of osteoporosis. It may prove useful in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, as an alternative to HRT, in women with oestrogen dependent neoplasia and those who do not wish to bleed.
No more than 50%–60% of women on HRT will continue to take it beyond one year and one of the main causes of non-compliance with HRT in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women is withdrawal bleeding, particularly if irregular or heavy. Progestogenic side effects adversely affect compliance, but manipulation of the dose and type of the progestogen may help to ameliorate this problem. However, reducing the dose of the progestogen may jeopardise cycle control.
Unscheduled heavy bleeding with poor predictability of the day of onset has been documented to occur in as many as 50% of postmenopausal women using oestradiol 2 mg daily with cyclical norethisterone 1 mg/day, days 17–28 of the treatment cycle.78 Such incidence is indeed prevalent among all cyclical combined HRT preparations in use.79 The cycle may be regulated by increasing the dose of progestogen, but this may increase the incidence of progestogen induced adverse effects.
Continuous combined HRT (progestogen along with oestrogen) has been suggested as an alternative to improve compliance as it is associated with a lower frequency of bleeding. Such regimens prevent bleeding as the progestogen maintains the endometrium in the thin and atrophic state. Nevertheless, 50% of women experience bleeding episodes during the first six months of treatment57 and about 40% discontinued treatment during the first year for a variety of reasons; including 8% due to unacceptable bleeding. This raises the issue of further investigation of the endometrium if bleeding continues beyond six months from commencement of continuous combined HRT, when it has to be considered as “postmenopausal bleeding” and investigated as such. Older women may be more suited to receive a low dose continuous combined HRT (oestradiol 1 mg and norethisterone 0.5 mg), or it may be prescribed in those women who develop adverse effects on the standard dose of continuous combined HRT—for example, oestradiol 2 mg with norethisterone 1 mg, or, conjugated equine oestrogens (0.625 mg) with 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone.
Another important factor in the management of postmenopausal women on HRT is the finding of a twofold increase of abnormal bleeding in the presence of submucous fibroids, odd ratio 2.4, 95%CI 1.25 to 4.53.80 Whether the presence of these structural abnormalities reflects abnormal development of the vascular supply to the endometrium is not known. However, their hysteroscopic removal may rectify this problem in the vast majority of instances.81
Other factors that affect compliance include:
Weight gain: increase in appetite is caused by the progestogen component of the HRT regimen and appropriate dietary advice should be given. Oestrogen induces redistribution of fat thus reducing the waist:hip ratio.
Cancer phobia (see below).
Risk of breast cancer
Cancer of the breast is the second most common cancer in the female population of the Western world. Its incidence rises sharply between the age of 50 and 60. It is a multifactorial condition and its aetiological relationship to oestrogen therapy has been suggested but never proved. Fear of causality is the most commonly stated reason for discontinuation of HRT.
An increased relative risk of breast cancer in women receiving oestrogen replacement treatment, postulated to be around 1.33 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.57), is shown in only one significant study,82while refuted in many others.83-85 Further, data from the Leisure World follow up study showed that the risk of breast cancer mortality in oestrogen users was 0.81.86 The addition of progestogens, sequential or continuous combined, to offset the endometrial effects of oestrogen, has not been shown to offer protection against breast cancer.87 Nevertheless, when counselling women who wish to start HRT, all these issues should be discussed. Women should be advised on breast self examination on monthly basis, and to have a breast examination annually by their doctor or practice nurse. Although this may result in increasing referrals to breast units with attendant anxieties while awaiting the results of investigations, it is in my view a fundamental part of the “breast awareness” campaign. Screening mammography is currently performed in the UK every three years between the ages of 50 to 64, but 25% of interval cancers not identified at screening occur between the second and third year. Therefore particularly in high risk women, mammography is advised at least every two years. Data on mammographic screening, which were started at the age of 45 and performed at two years intervals, resulted in 25% reduction in mortality after 14 years of follow up.88 These data are in agreement with most meta-analyses of randomised trials.89
The use of unopposed oestrogen, cyclically or continuously administered, promotes endometrial mitotic activity and can result in hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and early carcinoma of the endometrium. After one year of treatment the incidence of hyperplasia is increased to 20%.90 The average time for progression of hyperplasia to carcinoma of the endometrium is about five years, and 25%–30% of atypical hyperplasia progress to carcinoma within one year.91
In a recent case-control study from Sweden the relative risk of developing endometrial carcinoma after five or more years of use of unopposed oestrogen is markedly increased: for oestradiol (odds ratio (OR) = 6.2; 95% CI 3.6 to 12.0) and for conjugated equine oestrogens (OR = 6.6; 95% CI 3.1 to 12.6). The use of cyclical progestin reduced the risk dramatically (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4), but this risk increased in women who use the progestin for less than 16 days per cycle, most commonly 10 days per cycle (OR = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.8 to 4.6 for five or more years of use). Continuous progestin use along with oestrogens, on the other hand, was associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.8 for five or more years of use).92
It should be emphasised that the menopause is a positive step in a woman's life, it is the beginning of the postreproductive phase of her life, when she may pursue a new career, education, or vocation. The symptoms of oestrogen deprivation can be relieved by oestrogen treatment, which if taken long term will help to prevent genital atrophy and reduce the risks of disabilities related to osteoporosis. There is increasing evidence for the role of HRT in reducing the risks of cardiovascular diseases. These issues highlight the importance of HRT and rank it among the most significant preventative public health programmes. The commitment to long term HRT, however, is not an easy decision for women, especially when they are asymptomatic. In order to enhance the acceptance of the preventative role of HRT in our ageing society, the woman must be given the opportunity to ask questions after adequate counselling, and the balance of risks and benefits have to be amply explained, such that she is enabled to make informed health choices.