rss
Postgrad Med J 1999;75:650-656 doi:10.1136/pgmj.75.889.650
  • Review
  • Classic diseases revisited

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Lyme neuroborreliosis are preventable

  1. Avinash Prasad,
  2. Douglas Sankar
  1. Department of Neurology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
  1. Avinash Prasad MD, 212 Copeley Road #3, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
  • Accepted 7 April 1999

Abstract

The problems of diagnosis and treatment of Lyme neuroborreliosis can be minimised by strictly following the clinical diagnostic criteria, and understanding the pitfalls of laboratory tests. The diagnosis is based solely on objective clinical findings, with serologic test results used only to confirm the diagnosis. It must be underscored that serologic testing, when ordered without regard for clinical presentation (ie, used as a screen), may be misleading due to its extremely low positive predictive value. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay should always be confirmed by Western blot. The cerebrospinal fluid Borrelia burgdorferiantibody index is more meaningful than simple titres of specific antibody. Polymerase chain reaction is still a research tool and should not be utilised without clinical correlation. All serologic tests and polymerase chain reaction may remain positive long after successful treatment. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment can be minimised by following these guidelines.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.