Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2007;83:633-637; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.060202
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, R
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, R
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, E

REVIEWS

A systematic review of randomised clinical trials of individualised herbal medicine in any indication

R Guo , P H Canter , E Ernst

Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, Exeter, UK

Correspondence to:
Peter H Canter, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter, EX2 4NT, UK; peter.canter{at}pms.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
Aim: To summarise and critically evaluate the evidence from randomised clinical trials for the effectiveness of individualised herbal medicine in any indication.

Methods: Search of electronic databases and approaches to experts in the field to identify randomised, controlled clinical trials of individualised herbal medicine in any indication. Independent data extraction and assessment of methodological quality by two authors and best evidence synthesis.

Results: Three randomised clinical trials of individualised herbal medicine were identified. Statistically non-significant trends favouring active over placebo treatment in osteoarthritis of the knee probably result from large baseline differences and regression to the mean. Individualised treatment was superior to placebo in four of five outcome measures in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, but was inferior to standardised herbal treatment in all outcomes. Individualised herbal treatment was no better than placebo in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

Conclusions: There is a sparsity of evidence regarding the effectiveness of individualised herbal medicine and no convincing evidence to support the use of individualised herbal medicine in any indication.


Abbreviations: BSS, Bowel Symptom Score; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; MYMOP, Measure Yourself Outcome Profile; RCT, randomised clinical trial; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Fatally Flawed Study Design in Herbal Medicine Review Article
E. J. Koprowski, M.A.
Postgrad Med J Online, 9 Oct 2007 [Full text]
A startling inadequacy in the links between the review evidence and the authors’ conclusions.
Ally Broughton
Postgrad Med J Online, 21 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Systematic review of individualised herbal medicine misunderstood
Peter H Canter, et al.
Postgrad Med J Online, 17 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Oriental Medicine Doctors Licensed As Primary Care Providers in the U.S.
E.J. Koprowski
Postgrad Med J Online, 9 Nov 2007 [Full text]
The evidence applies to all individualised herbal medicine
Peter H Canter
Postgrad Med J Online, 21 Nov 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine