EDITORIALS
Chest x rays—who should report them acutely?
1 Northwest London Hospitals NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, Park Royal, London, UK
2 Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Gillian Bain, Northwest London Hospitals NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, Acton Lane, Park Royal, London NW10 7NS, UK; Gillian.Bain@nwlh.nhs.uk
Keywords: chest x ray; diagnostic errors; radiology; emergency medicine
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The chest radiograph (CXR) is the most widely performed radiological examination, but is considered to be one of the most complex imaging modalities to interpret.1 Most patients admitted as a medical emergency have one taken, and yet the circumstances under which this is performed—for example, in the acutely ill, poorly positioned patient taking an inadequate breath—reduce the subsequent quality of the image, adding to the difficulties of interpretation. Despite this, initial assessment of the CXR is often left to relatively inexperienced junior doctors, with limited training in radiology, who may misinterpret the images, possibly leading to inappropriate management including the use of antibiotics,2–4 or unnecessary further imaging, increasing cost and risking further morbidity during the admission. Serious lesions may be missed and the diagnosis of malignancy delayed, which may affect a patients survival.3 5–7 Several authors have demonstrated that radiologists, not surprisingly, make significantly fewer errors than other clinicians in the
Relevant Article
- Do radiologists still need to report chest x rays?
- P Mehrotra, V Bosemani, J Cox
Postgrad. Med. J. 2009 85: 339-341.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
