Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2008;84:385; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.127563
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.

COCHRANE CORNER

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis

F Khan1, L Turner-Stokes2, L Ng3, T Kilpatrick4

1 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
2 Herbert Dunhill Chair of Rehabilitation, Kings College London, UK and Regional Hospital Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
3 Neurorehabilitation Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
4 Centre for Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to:
Dr F Khan, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia; fary.khan@mh.org.au

Submitted 24 June 2007 Revision received 11 September 2007.

Accepted 19 September 2007

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) is an important component of symptomatic and supportive treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), but evidence base for its effectiveness is yet to be established.


OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of organised MDR in adults with MS. MDR was defined as an inpatient, outpatient, home or community based programme, delivered by two or more disciplines in conjunction with physician consultation, and targeted towards improvements at the level of activity and/or participation.


METHODS

The Cochrane MS Group methods search strategy identified all randomised (RCT) and controlled (CCT) clinical trials that compared MDR with routinely available local services or lower levels of intervention, or trials comparing interventions in different settings or at different levels of intensity. Three reviewers selected trials and rated their methodological quality independently. Methodological quality criteria (n = 17) proposed by van Tulder and colleagues1 2 were used to assess internal validity, and descriptive and statistical criteria (details are available . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.