PERSONAL VIEW
Diagnostic errors
Diagnostic greed: using pictures to highlight diagnostic errors
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Hangwi Tang
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane; hangwitang@yahoo.com
Illustrating diagnostic greed and other diagnostic errors using pictures
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
More than 30 years ago, Maurice Pappworth cautioned against the sin of "diagnostic greed". "Overwhelming evidence is not essential for correct diagnosis, and the absence of some expected symptom or sign often does not invalidate an otherwise reasonable diagnosis."1
Many junior clinicians have difficulty formulating a differential diagnosis after history-taking and clinical examination. The sin of diagnostic greed is common. There is little difficulty diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism if a patient is a returned air traveller and has pleuritic chest pain, haemoptysis, hypoxaemia and an ECG showing S1Q3T3. Likewise, coeliac disease is easily diagnosed if a child has chronic diarrhoea, failure to thrive, iron deficiency anaemia and the itchy rash of dermatitis herpetiformis. However, such "full-house" clinical presentations are rare.
The pictures in fig 1
are helpful in illustrating diagnostic greed and other diagnostic errors. The pictures show two steaks, one on top of the
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
