Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:203; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.026807
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:203
© 2005 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

EDITORIAL

Research

Limitations of "pragmatic" trials

E Ernst, P H Canter

Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor E Ernst
Edzard.Ernst@pms.ac.uk


Pragmatic trials are often comparatively weak research tools

Keywords: clinical trials; pragmatic trials

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Clinical trials testing the value of therapeutic interventions range between the two extremes of maximal internal or external validity. The former study, often called an efficacy trial, tests a treatment under optimal (that is, near laboratory) conditions, in which features such as the patient sample, the intervention, and the outcome measures are narrowly defined. Their research question is usually whether the treatment is efficacious when used under optimal conditions. Unfortunately this can mean that the findings are not generalisable—that is, the results of such studies cannot necessarily be transferred to the wider population.

At the other end of the spectrum, pragmatic (practical or effectivity) trials are aimed to approximate the reality of clinical practice. Pragmatic trials have been defined as "trials for which the hypothesis and study design are formulated based on information needed to make a decision".1 The test treatment is often compared with clinically relevant interventions or . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zwarenstein, M., Treweek, S., Gagnier, J. J, Altman, D. G, Tunis, S., Haynes, B., Oxman, A. D, Moher, D., for the CONSORT and Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare, (2008). Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 337: a2390-a2390 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.