Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2009;85:564-568; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2009.079491
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.

ETHICS AND LAW

Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students

F Tyrer1, M Williams1, L Feathers2, C Faull2, I Baker3

1 NIHR Research Design Service for the East Midlands, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
2 Leicestershire and Rutland Hospice, Groby Road, Leicester, UK
3 Ty Olwen, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to F Tyrer, NIHR Research Design Service for the East Midlands, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK; fct2{at}le.ac.uk

Background: A number of studies have explored doctors’ views and experiences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but to our knowledge there has been no research to identify the information that doctors take into account when they make decisions about CPR.

Purpose of study: To investigate factors that influence decisions about CPR.

Study design: Qualitative study involving six focus groups with 17 doctors and four medical students in Leicester, UK.

Results: Doctors and medical students considered a number of factors important when making decisions about CPR—namely, the patient’s diagnosis, prognosis, age, quality of life, the opinions of doctors and other medical staff, and the wishes of patients and relevant others. The relative importance of each of these factors varied significantly and was influenced by the doctors’ own beliefs and values.

Conclusions: Doctors would benefit from greater support for their decision making in relation to resuscitation to reduce variability in clinical practice and to promote appropriate patient care. Identification of factors that influence doctors’ individual beliefs, attitudes and values towards resuscitation and improvement in the quality of patient communication may help to guide policy in this area.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; do not attempt resuscitation; DNAR; focus groups


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The resuscitation game continues: what is really going on?
Len Doyal, Lesley Doyal, Daniel Sokol
Postgrad. Med. J. 2009 85: 561-563. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Doyal, L., Doyal, L., Sokol, D. (2009). The resuscitation game continues: what is really going on?. Postgrad. Med. J. 85: 561-563 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.