HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Massin, M M Articles by Dessy, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Massin, M M Articles by Dessy, H

Delayed recognition of congenital heart disease

¹ Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Queen Fabiola Children’s University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium
² Division of Paediatric Cardiology, University of Liège at CHR Citadelle, Belgium

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor M Massin
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, CHR Citadelle (University of Liège), Boulevard du 12è de Ligne, 1, B-4000 Liège, Belgium; martial.massin{at}chrcitadelle.be

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the proportion of children with delayed recognition of congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods: Of the 744 children with CHD primarily diagnosed during a 10 year period in one hospital, the patients were identified where the diagnosis of CHD was established with a significant delay.

Results: Sixty six patients (8.9%) had delayed diagnosis of CHD. Among patients with cyanotic CHD, 10.4% (7 of 67 cases) were referred after they had initially been discharged home from the birth clinic. Among patients with acyanotic CHD, 8.7% (59 of 677) of all children and 35.1% (59 of 168) of the children who required surgery or interventional catheterisation were referred at an age where elective repair should have already been performed or needed immediate treatment because of their haemodynamic status. Of the 66 patients with delayed diagnosis, one infant with cor triatriatum died at admission because of delayed referral and 10 children had severe complications: preoperative cardiogenic shock in seven cases of aortic coarctation and one case of endocardial fibroelastosis, pulmonary hypertensive crisis in one child after delayed repair of a ventricular septal defect, and infectious endocarditis after dental care in a teenager with undiagnosed moderate aortic stenosis, who required Ross operation a few months later.

Discussion and conclusion: A substantial proportion of CHD was detected with relevant delay. In all cases of late diagnosis, clinical cardiac findings were present that should have alerted the physician on the possible presence of underlying CHD.

Keywords: diagnosis; congenital heart disease; child