Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER


[Advanced]
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2006;82:425-428; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bansal, G J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bansal, G J

REVIEW

Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging

G J Bansal

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G J Bansal
16 Cherry Tree Avenue, Scarborough, North Yorkshire YO12 5DX, UK; gauravjyoti{at}yahoo.com

The development of computed radiography over the past two decades has transformed radiological imaging. The radiology departments in the 21st century will look very different from those in the preceding period. In this review, the development of digital radiography is presented with a description of its various forms and a comparison with screen film radiography.

Abbreviations: SFR, screen film radiography; PACS, picture archiving and communications system; DR, digital radiography; CR, computed radiography

Keywords: digital radiography; computed radiography; diagnostic imaging






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine