REVIEW
Thrombolysis: past, present, and future
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D Gray
University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; d.gray{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Management of myocardial infarction evolved because of understanding of underlying disease processes and clinical trials of "chemical" and "mechanical" clot dissolution that reduced in-hospital mortality. Meta-analysis comparing these treatment strategies marginally favours angioplasty. Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines propose primary angioplasty as the preferred therapeutic option but few units in the UK can offer angioplasty on demand as a designated "heart attack centre". Thrombolysis will continue as it is widely available and training needs and costs less than angioplasty. Community thrombolysis should be made available for those patients who do not wish for such aggressive intervention or as a prelude to transfer time to a heart attack centre distant from a triage hospital.
Keywords: thrombolysis; 183
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- Citation Map
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
