Postgrad Med J

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Postgraduate Medical Journal 2006;82:363-371; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.044099
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only appendix
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maslekar, S
Right arrow Articles by Duthie, G S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maslekar, S
Right arrow Articles by Duthie, G S

REVIEW

Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence

S Maslekar , A Gardiner , C Maklin , G S Duthie

University of Hull, Academic Surgical Unit, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrG S Duthie
University of Hull, Academic Surgical Unit, Castle Hill Hospital, Castle Road, Cottingham, East Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, UK; g.s.duthie{at}hull.ac.uk

Faecal incontinence is a debilitating condition affecting people of all ages, and significantly impairs quality of life. Proper clinical assessment followed by conservative medical therapy leads to improvement in more than 50% of cases, including patients with severe symptoms. Patients with advanced incontinence or those resistant to initial treatment should be evaluated by anorectal physiology testing to establish the severity and type of incontinence. Several treatment options with promising results exist. Patients with gross sphincter defects should undergo surgical repair. Those who fail to respond to sphincteroplasty and those with no anatomical defects have the option of either sacral nerve stimulation or other advanced procedures. Stoma formation should be reserved for patients who do not respond to any of the above procedures.


Abbreviations: FI, faecal incontinence; EAUS, endoanal ultrasonography; IAS, internal anal sphincter; EAS, external anal sphincter; IP, impedance planimetry; PNTML, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency; ACE, antegrade continence enema; ABS, artificial bowel sphincter; SNS, sacral nerve stimulation

Keywords: anal sphincter; faecal incontinence; anal sphincter repair; sacral nerve stimulation; anorectal physiology; review




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Berton, G. Gola, and S. R. Wilson
Sonography of Benign Conditions of the Anal Canal: An Update
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 765 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine