Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2006;82:70-72; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.033738
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

From presentation to publication: the natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United Kingdom

E Guryel, A W Durrant, R Alakeson, D M Ricketts

Department of Orthopaedics, Princess Royal Hospital, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrD Ricketts
Department of Orthopaedics, Princess Royal Hospital, Lewes Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH16 4EX, UK; Consultdmr{at}aol.com

Background: Up to 63% of the chapters in major orthopaedic textbooks use the results from abstracts that have been presented at international orthopaedic meetings.

Methods: Orthopaedic abstracts were reviewed that were presented at the 1997 and 1998 meetings of the British Orthopaedic Association and other specialist orthopaedic meetings. The number of abstracts that had gone on to a full text publication was assessed and changes in study design or outcome were determined.

Results: Of the 415 abstracts 137 (33.0%) went on to full text publication. Abstracts presented at the British Orthopaedic Association were significantly more likely to go on to full text publication than abstracts from the other meetings studied. The mean time to publication was 15.6 months. Sample sizes in unpublished studies were smaller (mean 129.8 subjects compared with a mean of 191.4 subjects for published studies). Of full text papers, 19.0% differed regarding study design from the abstract presented at the initial meeting and 10.9% had published different results. Randomised controlled trials had the highest rate of later full text publication (53.6%) followed by observational studies (32.8%), basic science studies (31.4%), and case reports (6.7%).

Conclusions: In comparison with a study from North America, similar numbers of abstracts presented at meetings finally became published as full text articles, the abstracts had fewer authors, more often included randomised controlled trials and follow up data, and had fewer changes to the results. It is questionable whether the inclusion of such results from abstracts presented at international meetings by major orthopaedic textbooks should be undertaken before full text publication.

Keywords: orthopaedics; publication


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.