Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:401-403; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.023861
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:401-403
© 2005 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patients undergoing coronary revascularisation: a missed opportunity for secondary prevention?

D J Fox1, M Kibiro1, J Eichhöfer1, N P Curzen2

1 Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
2 Wessex Cardiac Unit, Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D J Fox
Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; david.j.fox{at}talk21.com

Background: This study tested the hypothesis that the opportunity to start secondary prevention therapy before discharge after coronary revascularisation is being missed. The study assessed current prescribing practice and identified discrepancies in prescribing for patients managed by surgeons (especially) and cardiologists.

Methods: 200 consecutive patients from the Manchester Heart Centre percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass (CABG) registries were identified (100 from each registry) and the notes analysed. All had undergone coronary revascularisation from February 2002 to March 2002. Data were analysed using SPSS for Windows, version 10.1.

Results: After exclusion of two patients with contraindications, 100% (98 of 98) of PCI patients and 92% (90 of 98) CABG patients were prescribed aspirin at discharge. Eight two per cent of eligible PCI patients and 70% of eligible CABG patients were prescribed ß blockers at discharge. Ninety six per cent (96 of 100) of PCI patients and 73% (73 of 100) of CABG patients were prescribed statins of any dose at discharge, (p<0.001). Sixty five per cent of PCI but only 26% of CABG patients were discharged prescribed ACE inhibitors (eligible patients based on HOPE, heart outcomes prevention evaluation trial), (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Secondary prevention prescription after coronary revascularisation remains suboptimal in all but aspirin use. Patients in the PCI group were statistically more likely to be discharged prescribed a statin or an ACE inhibitor, or both, than patients after CABG. Both interventional cardiologists and (especially) cardiac surgeons must improve their use of secondary prevention therapy.

Abbreviations: PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft

Keywords: coronary revascularisation; secondary prevention; statins; ACE inhibitors; ß blockers


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pocar, M., Donatelli, F., Moneta, A., Tomoda, H., Tayek, J. A., Arnold, J. R., Banning, A. P., Park, S.-J., Park, D.-W., Kim, Y.-H. (2008). Stents versus Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. NEJM 359: 423-425 [Full Text]  
  • Turley, A. J., Roberts, A. P., Morley, R., Thornley, A. R., Owens, W. A., de Belder, M. A. (2008). Secondary prevention following coronary artery bypass grafting has improved but remains sub-optimal: the need for targeted follow-up. ICVTS 7: 231-234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.