Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:411-414; doi:10.1136/pgmj.2003.011247
Copyright © 2004 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:411-414
© 2004 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Non-clinical factors influencing the selection of patients with acute coronary syndromes for angiography

A Quaas, N Curzen and C Garratt

Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Alexander Quaas
c/o Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M139WL, UK; alex_quaas{at}hotmail.com

Objective: To analyse clinical and non-clinical factors determining the selection for coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Design: Single centre, prospective cohort study.

Participants: Eighty consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of ACS during the period 21 May 2001 to 4 July 2001.

Setting: Coronary care unit of a tertiary referral centre, the Manchester Royal Infirmary.

Data collection: Information concerning baseline patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and the selection for angiography was collected from the patient notes.

Data analysis: Windows SPSS version 9.0 using cross tabulations with {chi}2 estimation and binomial logistic regression analysis.

Main outcome measure: Selection for angiography in ACS.

Results: Cross tabulations with {chi}2 analysis and logistic regression analysis identified significant non-clinical factors predicting the use of angiography. Although clinical factors such as recurrent ischaemia (odds ratio 5.11) influenced the decision to undergo coronary angiography, non-clinical factors such as young age (odds ratio 6.88 for <65 years old), gender (odds ratio 3.81 for males), admission on a weekday (odds ratio 0.2488 for admission on the weekend), and consultant in charge (odds ratio 0.111 for consultant "2") independently predicted the use of angiography in ACS.

Conclusion: The selection of patients for angiography in ACS is not based purely on clinical criteria. Awareness of the apparent sources of bias among clinical decision makers may improve management of these patients.

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndromes; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; OR, odds ratio

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; angiography; ischaemic heart disease; selection factors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kostis, W. J., Demissie, K., Marcella, S. W., Shao, Y.-H., Wilson, A. C., Moreyra, A. E., the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, (2007). Weekend versus Weekday Admission and Mortality from Myocardial Infarction. NEJM 356: 1099-1109 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.