Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:63-66; doi:10.1136/pmj.2003.011718
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2004;80:63-66
© 2004 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

REVIEW

Assessing clinical competency in medical senior house officers: how and why should we do it?

S J Carr

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S J Carr
Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; sue.carr{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk

Most consultants are involved in the training and assessment of several grades of doctors in training especially senior house officers (SHOs) and specialist registrars. In the medical and other specialties there is an increasing trend towards assessing junior doctors’ competency using the record of in-training assessment process for specialist registrars and using the Royal College of Physicians folder to record competences of medical SHOs. It is necessary to consider why there is a need to assess competency, how it may be done practically, and the advantages and disadvantages of this system of assessment. There are considerable hurdles to the implementation of this system in the medical specialties within today’s NHS and the organisation may need to undergo fairly radical change to facilitate this system.

Keywords: competence; senior house officer; education

Abbreviations: MCQ, multiple choice question; mini-CEX, mini-clinical evaluation exercise; OSCE, objective structured clinical examination; SHO, senior house officer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kloer, M., Mynors-Wallis, L., Cope, D. (2007). Basic competency testing to meet Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts standards. Psychiatr. Bull. 31: 173-175 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.